Bradbury Charlotte A, Lawler Patrick R, Stanworth Simon J, McVerry Bryan J, McQuilten Zoe, Higgins Alisa M, Mouncey Paul R, Al-Beidh Farah, Rowan Kathryn M, Berry Lindsay R, Lorenzi Elizabeth, Zarychanski Ryan, Arabi Yaseen M, Annane Djillali, Beane Abi, van Bentum-Puijk Wilma, Bhimani Zahra, Bihari Shailesh, Bonten Marc J M, Brunkhorst Frank M, Buzgau Adrian, Buxton Meredith, Carrier Marc, Cheng Allen C, Cove Matthew, Detry Michelle A, Estcourt Lise J, Fitzgerald Mark, Girard Timothy D, Goligher Ewan C, Goossens Herman, Haniffa Rashan, Hills Thomas, Huang David T, Horvat Christopher M, Hunt Beverley J, Ichihara Nao, Lamontagne Francois, Leavis Helen L, Linstrum Kelsey M, Litton Edward, Marshall John C, McAuley Daniel F, McGlothlin Anna, McGuinness Shay P, Middeldorp Saskia, Montgomery Stephanie K, Morpeth Susan C, Murthy Srinivas, Neal Matthew D, Nichol Alistair D, Parke Rachael L, Parker Jane C, Reyes Luis F, Saito Hiroki, Santos Marlene S, Saunders Christina T, Serpa-Neto Ary, Seymour Christopher W, Shankar-Hari Manu, Singh Vanessa, Tolppa Timo, Turgeon Alexis F, Turner Anne M, van de Veerdonk Frank L, Green Cameron, Lewis Roger J, Angus Derek C, McArthur Colin J, Berry Scott, Derde Lennie P G, Webb Steve A, Gordon Anthony C
University of Bristol, Bristol, England.
Peter Munk Cardiac Centre at University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA. 2022 Apr 5;327(13):1247-1259. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.2910.
The efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in critically ill patients with COVID-19 is uncertain.
To determine whether antiplatelet therapy improves outcomes for critically ill adults with COVID-19.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In an ongoing adaptive platform trial (REMAP-CAP) testing multiple interventions within multiple therapeutic domains, 1557 critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 were enrolled between October 30, 2020, and June 23, 2021, from 105 sites in 8 countries and followed up for 90 days (final follow-up date: July 26, 2021).
Patients were randomized to receive either open-label aspirin (n = 565), a P2Y12 inhibitor (n = 455), or no antiplatelet therapy (control; n = 529). Interventions were continued in the hospital for a maximum of 14 days and were in addition to anticoagulation thromboprophylaxis.
The primary end point was organ support-free days (days alive and free of intensive care unit-based respiratory or cardiovascular organ support) within 21 days, ranging from -1 for any death in hospital (censored at 90 days) to 22 for survivors with no organ support. There were 13 secondary outcomes, including survival to discharge and major bleeding to 14 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. An odds ratio (OR) greater than 1 represented improved survival, more organ support-free days, or both. Efficacy was defined as greater than 99% posterior probability of an OR greater than 1. Futility was defined as greater than 95% posterior probability of an OR less than 1.2 vs control. Intervention equivalence was defined as greater than 90% probability that the OR (compared with each other) was between 1/1.2 and 1.2 for 2 noncontrol interventions.
The aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor groups met the predefined criteria for equivalence at an adaptive analysis and were statistically pooled for further analysis. Enrollment was discontinued after the prespecified criterion for futility was met for the pooled antiplatelet group compared with control. Among the 1557 critically ill patients randomized, 8 patients withdrew consent and 1549 completed the trial (median age, 57 years; 521 [33.6%] female). The median for organ support-free days was 7 (IQR, -1 to 16) in both the antiplatelet and control groups (median-adjusted OR, 1.02 [95% credible interval {CrI}, 0.86-1.23]; 95.7% posterior probability of futility). The proportions of patients surviving to hospital discharge were 71.5% (723/1011) and 67.9% (354/521) in the antiplatelet and control groups, respectively (median-adjusted OR, 1.27 [95% CrI, 0.99-1.62]; adjusted absolute difference, 5% [95% CrI, -0.2% to 9.5%]; 97% posterior probability of efficacy). Among survivors, the median for organ support-free days was 14 in both groups. Major bleeding occurred in 2.1% and 0.4% of patients in the antiplatelet and control groups (adjusted OR, 2.97 [95% CrI, 1.23-8.28]; adjusted absolute risk increase, 0.8% [95% CrI, 0.1%-2.7%]; 99.4% probability of harm).
Among critically ill patients with COVID-19, treatment with an antiplatelet agent, compared with no antiplatelet agent, had a low likelihood of providing improvement in the number of organ support-free days within 21 days.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02735707.
抗血小板治疗对危重症新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者的疗效尚不确定。
确定抗血小板治疗是否能改善危重症成年COVID-19患者的预后。
设计、设置和参与者:在一项正在进行的适应性平台试验(REMAP-CAP)中,该试验在多个治疗领域测试多种干预措施,于2020年10月30日至2021年6月23日期间,从8个国家的105个地点招募了1557例危重症成年COVID-19患者,并进行了90天的随访(最终随访日期:2021年7月26日)。
患者被随机分配接受开放标签的阿司匹林(n = 565)、P2Y12抑制剂(n = 455)或不进行抗血小板治疗(对照组;n = 529)。干预措施在医院持续进行最多14天,且是在抗凝血栓预防之外。
主要终点是21天内无器官支持天数(存活且无基于重症监护病房的呼吸或心血管器官支持的天数),从住院期间任何死亡的-1天(在90天时截尾)到无器官支持的幸存者的22天。有13个次要结局,包括出院存活和至14天的大出血。主要分析是贝叶斯累积逻辑模型。比值比(OR)大于1表示生存改善、无器官支持天数增加或两者兼有。疗效定义为OR大于1的后验概率大于99%。无效性定义为与对照组相比,OR小于1.2的后验概率大于95%。干预等效性定义为两种非对照干预措施的OR(相互比较)在1/1.2和1.2之间的概率大于90%。
在适应性分析中,阿司匹林组和P2Y12抑制剂组符合预先定义的等效标准,并进行了统计学合并以进行进一步分析。与对照组相比,合并抗血小板组达到预先指定的无效标准后停止入组。在1557例随机分组的危重症患者中,8例患者撤回同意书,1549例完成试验(中位年龄57岁;521例[33.6%]为女性)。抗血小板组和对照组的无器官支持天数中位数均为7天(四分位间距,-1至16天)(中位调整OR,1.02[95%可信区间{CrI},0.86 - 1.23];无效的后验概率为95.7%)。抗血小板组和对照组患者出院存活的比例分别为71.5%(723/1011)和67.9%(354/521)(中位调整OR,1.27[95% CrI,0.99 - 1.62];调整后的绝对差异,5%[95% CrI,-0.2%至9.5%];疗效的后验概率为97%)。在幸存者中,两组的无器官支持天数中位数均为14天。抗血小板组和对照组分别有2.1%和0.4%的患者发生大出血(调整后的OR,2.97[95% CrI,1.23 - 8.28];调整后的绝对风险增加,0.8%[95% CrI,0.1% - 2.7%];有害的概率为99.4%)。
在危重症COVID-19患者中,与不使用抗血小板药物相比,使用抗血小板药物治疗在21天内无器官支持天数改善方面的可能性较低。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02735707。