Suppr超能文献

损伤机制和特殊考虑因素作为严重损伤的预测因素:系统评价。

Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;29(9):1106-1117. doi: 10.1111/acem.14489. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's field triage guidelines (FTG) are routinely used by emergency medical services personnel for triaging injured patients. The most recent (2011) FTG contains physiologic, anatomic, mechanism, and special consideration steps. Our objective was to systematically review the criteria in the mechanism and special consideration steps that might be predictive of serious injury or need for a trauma center.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the predictive utility of mechanism and special consideration criteria for predicting serious injury. A research librarian searched in Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for studies published between January 2011 and February 2021. Eligible studies were identified using a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were excluded if they lacked an outcome for serious injury, such as measures of resource use, injury severity scores, mortality, or composite measures using a combination of outcomes. Given the heterogeneity in populations, measures, and outcomes, results were synthesized qualitatively focusing on positive likelihood ratios (LR+) whenever these could be calculated from presented data or adjusted odds ratios (aOR).

RESULTS

We reviewed 2418 abstracts and 315 full-text publications and identified 42 relevant studies. The factors most predictive of serious injury across multiple studies were death in the same vehicle (LR+ 2.2-7.4), ejection (aOR 3.2-266.2), extrication (LR+ 1.1-6.6), lack of seat belt use (aOR 4.4-11.3), high speeds (aOR 2.0-2.9), concerning crash variables identified by vehicle telemetry systems (LR+ 4.7-22.2), falls from height (LR+ 2.4-5.9), and axial load or diving (aOR 2.5-17.6). Minor or inconsistent predictors of serious injury were vehicle intrusion (LR+ 0.8-7.2), cardiopulmonary or neurologic comorbidities (LR+ 0.8-3.1), older age (LR+ 0.6-6.8), or anticoagulant use (LR+ 1.1-1.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Select mechanism and special consideration criteria contribute positively to appropriate field triage of potentially injured patients.

摘要

目的

疾病控制与预防中心的现场分类指南(FTG)通常被紧急医疗服务人员用于对受伤患者进行分类。最新(2011 年)的 FTG 包含生理、解剖、机制和特殊考虑步骤。我们的目标是系统地审查机制和特殊考虑步骤中的标准,这些标准可能对严重损伤或需要创伤中心的情况具有预测性。

方法

我们对机制和特殊考虑标准对预测严重损伤的预测效用进行了系统评价。一名研究图书管理员在 Ovid Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库中搜索了 2011 年 1 月至 2021 年 2 月期间发表的研究。使用事先确定的纳入和排除标准确定了合格的研究。如果研究缺乏严重损伤的结果,例如资源使用、损伤严重程度评分、死亡率或使用多种结果组合的综合措施,则将其排除在外。鉴于人群、措施和结果的异质性,结果是定性综合的,只要能够从呈现的数据中计算出阳性似然比(LR+)或调整后的优势比(aOR),就侧重于这些比。

结果

我们审查了 2418 篇摘要和 315 篇全文出版物,确定了 42 项相关研究。多项研究中最能预测严重损伤的因素是同一车辆内死亡(LR+ 2.2-7.4)、弹射(aOR 3.2-266.2)、救援(LR+ 1.1-6.6)、未使用安全带(aOR 4.4-11.3)、高速(aOR 2.0-2.9)、车辆遥测系统识别的令人担忧的碰撞变量(LR+ 4.7-22.2)、从高处坠落(LR+ 2.4-5.9)和轴向载荷或潜水(aOR 2.5-17.6)。严重受伤的轻微或不一致预测因素是车辆侵入(LR+ 0.8-7.2)、心肺或神经合并症(LR+ 0.8-3.1)、年龄较大(LR+ 0.6-6.8)或使用抗凝剂(LR+ 1.1-1.8)。

结论

选择机制和特殊考虑标准对潜在受伤患者的适当现场分诊有积极贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/413d/9545392/ac2209589250/ACEM-29-1106-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验