Suppr超能文献

并非所有机制都一样:一项全国性受伤患者现场分类指南的单中心经验。

Not all mechanisms are created equal: a single-center experience with the national guidelines for field triage of injured patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):140-5. doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3182988ae2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma systems use prehospital evaluation of anatomic and physiologic criteria and mechanism of injury (MOI) to determine trauma center need (TCN). MOI criteria are established nationally in a collaborative effort between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma and have been revised several times, most recently in 2011. Controversy exists as to which MOI criteria truly predict TCN. We review our single-center experience with past and present National Trauma Triage Criteria to determine which MOI predict TCN.

METHODS

The trauma registry of an urban Level I trauma center was reviewed from 2001 to 2011 for all patients meeting only MOI criteria. Patients meeting any anatomic and physiologic criteria were excluded. TCN was defined as death, Injury Severity Score (ISS) of greater than 15, emergency department transfusion, intensive care unit admission, need for laparotomy/thoracotomy/vascular surgery within 24 hours of arrival, pelvic fracture, 2 or more proximal long bone fractures, or neurosurgical intervention during admission. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify which MOI predict TCN.

RESULTS

A total of 3,569 patients were transported to our trauma center who met only MOI criteria and had the MOI recorded in the registry; 821 MOI patients (23%) were identified who met our definition of TCN. Significant predictors of TCN included death in the same passenger compartment, ejection from vehicle, extrication time of more than 20 minutes, fall from more than 20 feet, and pedestrian thrown/runover. Criteria not meeting TCN include vehicle intrusion, rollover motor vehicle collision, speed of more than 40 mph, injury from autopedestrian/autobicycle of more than 5 mph, and both of the motorcycle crash (MCC) criteria.

CONCLUSION

With the exception of vehicle intrusion and MCC, the new National Trauma Triage Criteria accurately predicts TCN. In addition, extrication time of more than 20 minutes was a positive predictor of TCN in our system. Elimination of the vehicle intrusion and MCC criteria and reevaluation of extrication time merits further study.

摘要

背景

创伤系统使用创伤前的解剖学和生理学标准以及损伤机制(MOI)来确定创伤中心的需求(TCN)。MOI 标准是由疾病控制与预防中心和美国外科医师学会创伤委员会合作在全国范围内建立的,并已多次修订,最近一次是在 2011 年。对于哪些 MOI 标准真正可以预测 TCN,存在争议。我们回顾了我们单一中心过去和现在的国家创伤分诊标准的经验,以确定哪些 MOI 可以预测 TCN。

方法

对 2001 年至 2011 年期间仅符合 MOI 标准的所有患者的城市一级创伤中心的创伤登记处进行了回顾。排除符合任何解剖学和生理学标准的患者。TCN 定义为死亡、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)大于 15、急诊输血、入住重症监护病房、在到达后 24 小时内需要剖腹术/开胸术/血管手术、骨盆骨折、2 个或更多近端长骨骨折,或在住院期间进行神经外科干预。使用逻辑回归分析来确定哪些 MOI 可以预测 TCN。

结果

共有 3569 名患者被送往我们的创伤中心,他们只符合 MOI 标准,并在登记处记录了 MOI;确定了 821 名 MOI 患者(23%)符合我们 TCN 的定义。TCN 的显著预测因素包括同一乘客舱内死亡、从车辆中弹出、解救时间超过 20 分钟、从 20 英尺以上坠落、行人被投掷/碾压。不符合 TCN 的标准包括车辆侵入、翻车机动车碰撞、速度超过 40 英里/小时、自车行人/自自行车超过 5 英里/小时的伤害,以及摩托车碰撞(MCC)标准的两项。

结论

除了车辆侵入和 MCC 外,新的国家创伤分诊标准准确地预测了 TCN。此外,在我们的系统中,超过 20 分钟的解救时间是 TCN 的阳性预测因素。消除车辆侵入和 MCC 标准,并重新评估解救时间,值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验