Amaducci L A, Rocca W A, Schoenberg B S
Neurology. 1986 Nov;36(11):1497-9. doi: 10.1212/wnl.36.11.1497.
Since the beginning of the century, psychiatrists and neurologists have been arguing about the identity of presenile (Alzheimer's disease) and senile dementia. History reveals that the distinction was originally based on anecdotal clinical observations and that competition among universities was one of the underlying determinants. The personal opinion of Kraepelin played a major role. Given his widespread reputation and authority, he generated a dogma difficult to change. Reports based on large clinicopathologic series have shown that the pathologies of presenile and senile dementia are not qualitatively different. Although the controversy continues, many have come to regard Alzheimer's disease and senile dementia as part of the same spectrum of disease, independent of the age of onset.
自本世纪初以来,精神科医生和神经科医生一直在争论早老性(阿尔茨海默病)和老年性痴呆的同一性。历史表明,这种区分最初是基于轶事性的临床观察,而大学之间的竞争是潜在的决定因素之一。克雷佩林的个人观点起到了主要作用。鉴于他广泛的声誉和权威性,他产生了一种难以改变的教条。基于大型临床病理系列的报告表明,早老性和老年性痴呆的病理学在性质上并无不同。尽管争议仍在继续,但许多人已开始将阿尔茨海默病和老年性痴呆视为同一疾病谱的一部分,而与发病年龄无关。