Independent Scholar, Fjälkestadsv. 410-82, 29194Kristianstad,
Department of Philosophy & Humanities, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX76019,
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Mar 23;45:e65. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21002387.
In our response to a truly diverse set of commentaries, we first summarize the principal topical themes around which they cluster, then address two "outlier" positions (the problem of consciousness has been solved vs. is intractable). Next, we address ways in which commentaries by non-integrated information theory (IIT) authors engage with the specifics of our IIT critique, turning finally to the four commentaries by IIT authors.
在我们对一组真正多样化的评论的回应中,我们首先总结了它们聚集的主要主题,然后讨论了两个“离群”的立场(意识问题已经解决与难以解决)。接下来,我们探讨了非整合信息理论(IIT)作者的评论如何与我们对 IIT 的批评的具体内容相契合,最后转向了四位 IIT 作者的评论。