Verschure Paul
Cognition and Behaviour - Centre for Neuroscience (DCN-FNWI), 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Mar 23;45:e63. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21002028.
Integrated information theory (IIT) is an example of "ironic science" and obstructs the scientific study of consciousness. By confusing the ontological status of a method to quantify network complexity with that of a theory of consciousness, IIT has to square the circle and spirals toward its panpsychism conclusion. I analyze the consequences of this fallacy and suggest how the study of consciousness can be brought back into the realm of rational, empirical science.
整合信息理论(IIT)是“讽刺科学”的一个例子,它阻碍了对意识的科学研究。通过将一种量化网络复杂性的方法的本体论地位与意识理论的本体论地位相混淆,IIT不得不做不可能之事,并朝着其泛心论结论螺旋式发展。我分析了这种谬误的后果,并提出如何将意识研究带回理性的经验科学领域。