Department of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, College of Education and Human Development, Missouri Prevention Science Institute, University of Missouri, 16 Hill Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Rutgers University, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Prev Sci. 2023 Jul;24(5):962-973. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01507-3. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
The overuse of exclusionary discipline practices, such as out-of-school suspensions (OSS), has consistently been documented over several decades. The resulting racial discipline disparities and the negative outcomes related to OSS have led policy makers and educators to consider other approaches to school discipline. One such approach, which has gained increasing use in the USA, is restorative practices (RP). However, despite its popularity, the experimental evidence base of the effects of RP and suspensions is extremely limited. To add to this knowledge base, we present findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial with 18 K-12 schools in an urban district in the US Northeast with 5878 students. Multilevel regression results, after 1 year of the intervention, showed no differences in the likelihood of suspension between students in the intervention and control schools and that the effects of the intervention did not vary by race/ethnicity, gender, or student disability status. However, for students in the intervention group, we show reductions in the likelihood of receiving an OSS for students who had previously been suspended.
几十年来,过度使用排斥性纪律措施(如校外停学)的问题一直有相关记录。由此产生的纪律处分差异以及与校外停学相关的负面后果,促使政策制定者和教育工作者考虑采用其他学校纪律处分方法。其中一种方法是恢复性实践(RP),在美国得到了越来越多的应用。然而,尽管它很受欢迎,但关于 RP 和校外停学效果的实验证据基础极其有限。为了增加这方面的知识基础,我们展示了在美国东北部一个城市学区的 18 所 K-12 学校进行的一项集群随机对照试验的结果,该学区有 5878 名学生。干预 1 年后的多层次回归结果显示,干预组和对照组学生的停学可能性没有差异,干预效果不因种族/族裔、性别或学生残疾状况而有所不同。然而,对于干预组的学生,我们发现之前被停学的学生再次被停学的可能性降低了。