Jansen Trine-Lise, Danbolt Lars Johan, Hanssen Ingrid, Hem Marit Helene
Norway, MF Norwegian School of Theology, Religion and Society, Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole (Lovisenberg Diaconal University College), Oslo, Norway.
MF Norwegian School of Theology, Religion and Society, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 23;22(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03832-3.
There is growing public criticism of the use of restraints or coercion. Demands for strengthened patient participation and prevention of coercive measures in mental health care has become a priority for care professionals, researchers, and policymakers in Norway, as in many other countries. We have studied in what ways this current ideal of reducing the use of restraints or coercion and attempting to practice in a least restrictive manner may raise morals issues and create experiences of moral distress in nurses working in acute psychiatric contexts.
Qualitative interview study, individual and focus group interviews, with altogether 30 nurses working in acute psychiatric wards in two mental health hospitals in Norway. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. A thematic analytic approach was chosen.
While nurses sense a strong expectation to minimise the use of restraints/coercion, patients on acute psychiatric wards are being increasingly ill with a greater tendency to violence. This creates moral doubt and dilemmas regarding how much nurses should endure on their own and their patients' behalf and may expose patients and healthcare personnel to greater risk of violence. Nurses worry that new legislation and ideals may prevent acutely mentally ill and vulnerable patients from receiving the treatment they need as well as their ability to create a psychological safe climate on the ward. Furthermore, persuading the patient to stay on the ward can cause guilt and uneasiness. Inadequate resources function as external constraints that may frustrate nurses from realising the treatment ideals set before them.
Mental health nurses working in acute psychiatric care are involved in a complex interplay between political and professional ideals to reduce the use of coercion while being responsible for the safety of both patients and staff as well as creating a therapeutic atmosphere. External constraints like inadequate resources may furthermore hinder the healthcare workers/nurses from realising the treatment ideals set before them. Caught in the middle nurses may experience moral distress that may lead to physical discomfort, uneasiness and feelings of guilt, shame, and defeat. Pressure on nurses and care providers to reduce or eliminate the use of coercion and reduction of health care spending are incompatible demands.
公众对使用约束措施或强制措施的批评日益增加。与许多其他国家一样,加强患者参与并防止在精神卫生保健中采取强制措施的要求已成为挪威护理专业人员、研究人员和政策制定者的首要任务。我们研究了当前减少约束措施或强制措施使用并试图以限制最小化方式开展实践的理念,可能会在何种程度上引发道德问题,并给在急性精神科环境中工作的护士带来道德困扰。
采用定性访谈研究,进行个人访谈和焦点小组访谈,共访谈了挪威两家精神卫生医院急性精神科病房的30名护士。访谈进行了录音和转录。采用了主题分析法。
虽然护士们强烈感受到尽量减少使用约束措施/强制措施的期望,但急性精神科病房的患者病情日益严重,暴力倾向增加。这就产生了道德疑问和困境,即护士应该为自己和患者忍受多少,这可能使患者和医护人员面临更大的暴力风险。护士担心新的立法和理念可能会阻止急性精神疾病患者和脆弱患者获得所需的治疗,以及他们在病房营造心理安全氛围的能力。此外,劝说患者留在病房可能会导致内疚和不安。资源不足成为外部限制因素,可能使护士无法实现摆在他们面前的治疗理想。
在急性精神科护理中工作的精神科护士,在减少强制措施使用的政治理想和专业理想之间,以及在对患者和工作人员安全负责并营造治疗氛围之间,陷入了复杂的相互作用之中。资源不足等外部限制因素,可能进一步阻碍医护人员/护士实现摆在他们面前的治疗理想。夹在中间的护士可能会经历道德困扰,这可能导致身体不适、不安以及内疚、羞耻和挫败感。要求护士和护理人员减少或消除强制措施的使用,与减少医疗保健支出的要求是相互矛盾的。