• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cochlear implant aesthetics and its impact on stigma, social interaction and quality of life: a mixed-methods study protocol.人工耳蜗美学及其对污名化、社会互动和生活质量的影响:一项混合方法研究方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 23;12(3):e058406. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058406.
2
The (in)visibility of deafness: Identity, stigma, quality of life and the potential role of totally implantable cochlear implants.耳聋的(不可见性):身份、污名、生活质量和完全可植入人工耳蜗的潜在作用。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14060. doi: 10.1111/hex.14060.
3
Qualitative, multimethod study of behavioural and attitudinal responses to cochlear implantation from the patient and healthcare professional perspective in Australia and the UK: study protocol.从患者和医疗保健专业人员角度对澳大利亚和英国人工耳蜗植入行为和态度反应的定性多方法研究:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 May 29;8(5):e019623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019623.
4
Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.用于单侧耳聋及传导性或混合性听力损失的植入式设备:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):1-165. eCollection 2020.
5
Addressing clinical equipoise for hearing devices: the qualitative COACH (q-COACH) study protocol for Australian stakeholder involvement in the design of a randomised controlled trial.解决听力设备的临床 equipoise:澳大利亚利益相关者参与随机对照试验设计的定性 COACH(q-COACH)研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 8;9(9):e030100. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030100.
6
What Influences Decision-Making for Cochlear Implantation in Adults? Exploring Barriers and Drivers From a Multistakeholder Perspective.是什么影响了成年人对人工耳蜗植入的决策?从多利益相关者的角度探讨障碍和驱动因素。
Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41(6):1752-1763. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000895.
7
Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.与采用标准护理路径的患者相比,使用远程护理对人工耳蜗植入患者进行个性化长期随访:一项可行性随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e011342. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011342.
8
Identity change of late-deafened adults after receiving cochlear implants.迟发性聋患者接受人工耳蜗植入后的身份转变。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 May;19(4):1463-1472. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2198565. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
9
ARCHS: adult recipients of cochlear implants: health and social long-term outcomes-a state-specific and national population-based retrospective cohort study protocol.ARCHS:人工耳蜗植入的成年受者:健康和社会长期结局——一项基于州别和全国人群的回顾性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e065567. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065567.
10
Exploring the recruitment, ethical considerations, conduct and information dissemination of an audiology trial: a pretrial qualitative study (q-COACH).探索一项听力学试验的招募、伦理考虑、实施和信息传播:一项试验前定性研究(q-COACH)。
Trials. 2020 Jan 6;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3968-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Link Between Sound Quality Perception, Music Perception, Music Engagement, and Quality of Life in Cochlear Implant Recipients.探索人工耳蜗植入者的音质感知、音乐感知、音乐参与度与生活质量之间的联系。
Audiol Res. 2025 Aug 2;15(4):94. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15040094.
2
The (in)visibility of deafness: Identity, stigma, quality of life and the potential role of totally implantable cochlear implants.耳聋的(不可见性):身份、污名、生活质量和完全可植入人工耳蜗的潜在作用。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14060. doi: 10.1111/hex.14060.
3
Current state of the art and future directions for implantable sensors in medical technology: Clinical needs and engineering challenges.医学技术中可植入传感器的当前技术水平与未来发展方向:临床需求与工程挑战。
APL Bioeng. 2023 Sep 27;7(3):031506. doi: 10.1063/5.0152290. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.二十一世纪的人工耳蜗研究与开发:重要更新。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2021 Oct;22(5):481-508. doi: 10.1007/s10162-021-00811-5. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
2
Rasch Analysis of the Listening Effort Questionnaire-Cochlear Implant.人工耳蜗听力努力问卷的拉施分析
Ear Hear. 2021;42(6):1699-1711. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001059.
3
Hearing loss prevalence and years lived with disability, 1990-2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.听力损失的患病率和残疾生存年数,1990-2019 年:来自 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的结果。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):996-1009. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00516-X.
4
Cost-benefit Analysis of Cochlear Implants: A Societal Perspective.人工耳蜗植入的成本效益分析:社会视角。
Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1338-1350. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001021.
5
Social representation of hearing aids among people with hearing loss: an exploratory study.听力损失人群对助听器的社会认知:一项探索性研究。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):964-978. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1886349. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
6
Cochlear implant indications: a review of third-party payers' policies for standard and expanded indications.人工耳蜗植入适应症:第三方支付方关于标准适应症和扩展适应症政策的综述
Cochlear Implants Int. 2021 Jul;22(4):237-244. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1877865. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
7
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission.《痴呆症的预防、干预与照护:柳叶刀委员会2020年报告》
Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
8
Development of a 60/60 Guideline for Referring Adults for a Traditional Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation.制定 60/60 指南,用于转介成人进行传统人工耳蜗植入候选评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Aug;41(7):895-900. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002664.
9
Adults' cochlear implant journeys through care: a qualitative study.成人耳蜗植入之旅的护理:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 24;20(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05334-y.
10
Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: A scoping review.成人人工耳蜗植入的效果:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232421. eCollection 2020.

人工耳蜗美学及其对污名化、社会互动和生活质量的影响:一项混合方法研究方案

Cochlear implant aesthetics and its impact on stigma, social interaction and quality of life: a mixed-methods study protocol.

作者信息

Rapport Frances, Lo Chi Yhun, Elks Beth, Warren Chris, Clay-Williams Robyn

机构信息

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 23;12(3):e058406. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058406.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058406
PMID:35321898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8943735/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Awareness of the benefits of cochlear implants is low, and barriers such as fear of surgery and ongoing rehabilitation have been noted. Perceived stigma associated with hearing loss also plays a key role, with many adults not wanting to appear old or be identified as a person with a disability. In effect, a cochlear implant makes deafness visible. New technologies have led to a smaller external profile for some types of cochlear implants, but qualitative assessments of benefit have not been explored. This study will examine cochlear implant aesthetics and cosmetics, and its impact on perceived stigma, social interactions, communication and quality of life. A particular focus will be the examination of totally implantable device concepts. A secondary aim is to understand what research techniques are best suited and most appealing for cochlear implant recipients, to assist in future study design and data collection methods.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study utilises a mixed-methods design. Three datasets will be collected from each participant with an expected sample size of 10-15 participants to allow for data saturation of themes elicited. Each participant will complete a demographic questionnaire, a quickfire survey (a short concise questionnaire on a topic of research familiarity and preference) and a semi-structured interview. Questionnaire and quickfire survey data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Interviews will be transcribed and analysed thematically. All participants will be adults with more than 1 year of experience using cochlear implants.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been granted ethical approval from Macquarie University (HREC: 520211056232432) and meets the requirements set out in the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Study findings will be disseminated widely through international peer-reviewed journal articles, public and academic presentations, plain language summaries for participants and an executive summary for the project funder. This work was supported by Cochlear Limited (Cochlear Ltd). The funder will have no role in conducting or reporting on the study.

摘要

引言

人们对人工耳蜗益处的认知度较低,且已注意到存在诸如对手术和持续康复的恐惧等障碍。与听力损失相关的感知耻辱感也起着关键作用,许多成年人不想显得年老或被认定为残疾人。实际上,人工耳蜗会使失聪变得明显。新技术已使某些类型的人工耳蜗的外部轮廓更小,但尚未对益处进行定性评估。本研究将考察人工耳蜗的美观性和美容效果,及其对感知耻辱感、社交互动、沟通和生活质量的影响。特别关注的将是对完全植入式设备概念的考察。第二个目标是了解哪些研究技术最适合且最吸引人工耳蜗接受者,以协助未来的研究设计和数据收集方法。

方法与分析

本研究采用混合方法设计。将从每位参与者收集三个数据集,预期样本量为10 - 15名参与者,以实现所引发主题的数据饱和。每位参与者将完成一份人口统计问卷、一份快速调查(一份关于研究熟悉度和偏好主题的简短简明问卷)和一次半结构化访谈。问卷和快速调查数据将使用描述性统计进行分析。访谈将进行转录并进行主题分析。所有参与者均为使用人工耳蜗超过1年的成年人。

伦理与传播

本研究已获得麦考瑞大学的伦理批准(人类研究伦理委员会:520211056