School of Psychology and Sports Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Vision and Hearing Sciences Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):964-978. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1886349. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
The aim of the current study was to examine the social representation (SR) of hearing aids in people with hearing loss (PHL) in India, the Republic of Korea (ROK), the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States of America (US).
The study used a cross-sectional survey design. The data collected by using a free association task were analysed qualitatively (i.e. content analysis) and quantitatively (i.e. chi-square analysis, similarities analysis, prototypical analysis).
424 participants with hearing loss.
The most commonly reported categories across all countries were "beneficial," "cost and time," and "appearance and design." Approximately 50% of the associations reported were negative. There were variations in terms of the categories that were predominant in the SR of each country. "Others actions and attitude" category was predominantly reported by PHL in India. "Disturbance" and "dissatisfaction" of hearing aids and the "repairs and maintenance of hearing aids" categories were mainly reported from the ROK and the US, respectively.
The current results highlight the main aspects that PHL report spontaneously when they think about hearing aids. The findings will help to further inform public health campaigns and will contribute to develop culturally appropriate media materials regarding hearing aids.
本研究旨在考察印度、韩国、英国和美国听力损失者(PHL)对助听器的社会表征(SR)。
本研究采用横断面调查设计。通过自由联想任务收集的数据进行了定性分析(即内容分析)和定量分析(即卡方分析、相似性分析、原型分析)。
424 名听力损失者。
在所有国家中,报告最多的类别是“有益”、“成本和时间”和“外观和设计”。约有 50%的关联是负面的。每个国家的 SR 中,主要类别的存在存在差异。印度 PHL 主要报告了“其他行动和态度”类别。“干扰”和“不满”助听器以及“助听器的维修和保养”类别主要分别来自韩国和美国。
目前的结果突出了 PHL 在想到助听器时自发报告的主要方面。这些发现将有助于进一步为公共卫生运动提供信息,并有助于开发有关助听器的文化适宜的媒体材料。