Department of Mental Health and Suicide, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Promenta Research Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Qual Life Res. 2022 Aug;31(8):2295-2305. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03113-2. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
We examined multidimensional, heterogeneous reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated measures to provide further insights into the developmental processes of risk and adaptation.
We used three-wave questionnaire data from 8156 individuals participating in the Norwegian County Public Health Survey assessed 1-5 months before and three (June 2020) and nine (December 2020) months after the outbreak. Latent profile and latent transition analyses were used to identify latent quality of life (QoL) classes and multiform changes, their probabilities, and predictors.
We identified five distinct QoL classes of varying proportions, namely Flourishing (i.e. 24-40%), Content (31-46%), Content-Symptomatic (8-10%), Languishing (14-20%), and Troubled (2-5%). Despite higher levels of negative affect and lower levels of life satisfaction and positive emotions, most individuals remained in their pre-pandemic QoL profiles. Yet, changes occurred for a meaningful proportion, with transition to a less favourable class more common than to a favourable. Between time 1 and 3, the flourishing and troubled groups decreased by 40% and 60%, while the content and languishing groups increased by 48% and 43%, respectively. Favourable pre-pandemic relational (marital status, support, interpersonal trust, and belonging), health, and economy-related status predicted significantly lower odds of belonging to the high-risk groups both pre-pandemic and during the pandemic.
Overall, this study shows lower levels of QoL amid the COVID-19 pandemic, but substantial stability in the QoL distribution, and an overall levelling of the QoL distribution. Our findings also underscore the importance of financial, health-related, and social capital to QoL.
我们研究了对 COVID-19 大流行及相关措施的多维、异质反应,以进一步了解风险和适应的发展过程。
我们使用了来自参加挪威县公共卫生调查的 8156 名个体的三波问卷调查数据,这些个体在疫情爆发前 1-5 个月和疫情爆发后 3 个月(2020 年 6 月)和 9 个月(2020 年 12 月)进行了评估。我们使用潜在剖面和潜在转变分析来确定不同比例的潜在生活质量(QoL)类别和多形态变化、它们的概率和预测因素。
我们确定了五个不同的 QoL 类别,比例不同,分别是:繁荣(即 24-40%)、满意(31-46%)、满意-症状(8-10%)、萎靡(14-20%)和困扰(2-5%)。尽管负性情绪水平较高,生活满意度和正性情绪水平较低,但大多数个体仍保持在疫情前的 QoL 水平。然而,发生了有意义的变化,向较差的类别转变比向较好的类别转变更为常见。在时间 1 和 3 之间,繁荣组和困扰组分别减少了 40%和 60%,而满意组和萎靡组分别增加了 48%和 43%。疫情前的有利关系(婚姻状况、支持、人际信任和归属感)、健康和经济相关状况预测,无论是在疫情前还是疫情期间,个体都有较低的几率属于高风险群体。
总的来说,这项研究表明,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,生活质量水平较低,但生活质量分布具有很大的稳定性,并且生活质量分布总体上趋于平衡。我们的研究结果还强调了财务、健康相关和社会资本对生活质量的重要性。