Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, James Black Centre, 125 Coldharbour Lane, London, SE5 9NU, UK.
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;9(3):1608-1615. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13910. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
The optimal strategy for diabetes control in patients with heart failure (HF) following myocardial infarction (MI) remains unknown. Metformin, a guideline-recommended therapy for patients with chronic HF and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is associated with reduced mortality and HF hospitalizations. However, worse outcomes have been reported when used at the time of MI. We compared outcomes of patients with T2DM and HF of ischaemic aetiology according to antidiabetic treatment.
This study used linked data from primary care, hospital admissions, and death registries for 4.7 million inhabitants in England, as part of the CALIBER resource. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint and all-cause mortality. To evaluate the effect of temporal changes in diabetes treatment, antidiabetic medication was included as time-dependent covariates in survival analyses. The study included 1172 patients with T2DM and prior MI and incident HF between 3 January 1998 and 26 February 2010. Five hundred and ninety-six patients had the primary outcome over median follow-up of 2.53 (IQR: 0.98-4.92) years. Adjusted analyses showed a reduced hazard of the composite endpoint for exposure to all antidiabetic medication with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.59], 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55-0.80), and 0.53 (95% CI: 0.43-0.65), respectively. A similar effect was seen for all-cause mortality [HRs of 0.43 (95% CI: 0.35-0.52), 0.57 (95% CI: 0.46-0.70), and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.27-0.43), respectively].
When considering changes in antidiabetic treatment over time, all drug classes were associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization.
心肌梗死(MI)后心力衰竭(HF)患者的糖尿病控制最佳策略仍不清楚。二甲双胍是慢性 HF 和 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的指南推荐治疗药物,与降低死亡率和 HF 住院率相关。然而,在 MI 时使用时,报告的结果更差。我们根据抗糖尿病治疗比较了缺血性病因 T2DM 和 HF 患者的结局。
这项研究使用了来自英格兰 470 万居民的初级保健、住院和死亡登记处的链接数据,作为 CALIBER 资源的一部分。主要终点是心血管死亡率和 HF 住院的复合终点。次要终点是主要终点的各个组成部分和全因死亡率。为了评估糖尿病治疗随时间变化的影响,将抗糖尿病药物作为生存分析中的时间依赖性协变量。该研究纳入了 1998 年 1 月 3 日至 2010 年 2 月 26 日期间发生 MI 和随后 HF 的 1172 例 T2DM 患者。中位随访 2.53 年(IQR:0.98-4.92)时,596 例患者出现主要终点。调整分析显示,暴露于所有抗糖尿病药物的复合终点的风险降低,风险比(HRs)分别为 0.50 [95%置信区间(CI):0.42-0.59]、0.66(95%CI:0.55-0.80)和 0.53(95%CI:0.43-0.65)。全因死亡率也观察到类似的效果[HRs 分别为 0.43(95%CI:0.35-0.52)、0.57(95%CI:0.46-0.70)和 0.34(95%CI:0.27-0.43)]。
当考虑随时间变化的抗糖尿病治疗变化时,所有药物类别均与降低心血管死亡率和 HF 住院风险相关。