• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同的患者,不同的偏好:一项多中心评估患者在共同决策中个性特征和焦虑的研究。

Different patients, different preferences: A multicenter assessment of patients' personality traits and anxiety in shared decision making.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2022 Aug;11(15):2999-3008. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4667. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.4667
PMID:35322925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9359866/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patient-centered care and shared decision making (SDM) are generally recognized as the gold standard for medical consultations, especially for preference-sensitive decisions. However, little is known about psychological patient characteristics that influence patient-reported preferences. We set out to explore the role of personality and anxiety for a preference-sensitive decision in bladder cancer patients (choice of urinary diversion, UD) and to determine if anxiety predicts patients' participation preferences.

METHODS

We recruited a sample of bladder cancer patients (N = 180, primarily male, retired) who awaited a medical consultation on radical cystectomy and their choice of UD. We asked patients to fill in a set of self-report questionnaires before this consultation, including measures of treatment preference, personality (BFI-10), anxiety (STAI), and participation preference (API and API-Uro), as well as sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Most patients (79%) indicated a clear preference for one of the treatment options (44% continent UD, 34% incontinent UD). Patients who reported more conscientiousness were more likely to prefer more complex methods (continent UD). The majority (62%) preferred to delegate decision making to healthcare professionals. A substantial number of patients reported elevated anxiety (32%), and more anxiety was predictive of higher participation preference, specifically for uro-oncological decisions (β = 0.207, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide insight into the role of psychological patient characteristics for SDM. Aspects of personality such as conscientiousness influence treatment preferences. Anxiety contributes to patients' motivation to be involved in pertinent decisions. Thus, personality and negative affect should be considered to improve SDM.

摘要

目的

以患者为中心的护理和共同决策(SDM)通常被认为是医疗咨询的黄金标准,尤其是对于偏好敏感的决策。然而,对于影响患者报告偏好的心理患者特征知之甚少。我们旨在探讨人格和焦虑对膀胱癌患者(选择尿流改道术,UD)偏好敏感决策的作用,并确定焦虑是否预测患者的参与偏好。

方法

我们招募了一组膀胱癌患者(N=180,主要为男性,已退休),他们正在等待根治性膀胱切除术的医疗咨询及其选择的 UD。我们要求患者在咨询前填写一套自我报告问卷,包括治疗偏好、人格(BFI-10)、焦虑(STAI)和参与偏好(API 和 API-Uro)以及社会人口统计学特征的测量。

结果

大多数患者(79%)表示对治疗方案之一有明确偏好(44%选择有节制的 UD,34%选择无节制的 UD)。报告责任心更强的患者更有可能倾向于选择更复杂的方法(有节制的 UD)。大多数患者(62%)选择将决策权委托给医疗保健专业人员。相当数量的患者报告焦虑程度升高(32%),更高的焦虑程度与更高的参与偏好相关,特别是对泌尿肿瘤学决策(β=0.207,p<0.01)。

结论

我们的研究结果提供了对 SDM 中心理患者特征作用的深入了解。人格特质如责任心会影响治疗偏好。焦虑会促进患者参与相关决策的动机。因此,应考虑人格和负面情绪以改善 SDM。

相似文献

1
Different patients, different preferences: A multicenter assessment of patients' personality traits and anxiety in shared decision making.不同的患者,不同的偏好:一项多中心评估患者在共同决策中个性特征和焦虑的研究。
Cancer Med. 2022 Aug;11(15):2999-3008. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4667. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
Getting specific: participation preference in urooncological decision-making.具体来说:参与尿路上皮癌决策的偏好。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02201-8.
3
Shared Decision Making in Health Care Visits for CKD: Patients' Decisional Role Preferences and Experiences.慢性肾脏病就诊中的共同决策:患者的决策角色偏好和体验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Dec;82(6):677-686. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
Is There a Relationship between Shared Decision Making and Breast Cancer Patients' Trust in Their Medical Oncologists?共享决策与乳腺癌患者对肿瘤医生信任之间是否存在关系?
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19889905. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
When attitudes and beliefs get in the way of shared decision-making: A mediation analysis of participation preference.当态度和信念阻碍共同决策时:参与偏好的中介分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):740-751. doi: 10.1111/hex.13699. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
6
How Does a Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Intervention for Oncologists Affect Participation Style and Preference Matching in Patients with Breast and Colon Cancer?针对肿瘤学家的共同决策(SDM)干预措施如何影响乳腺癌和结肠癌患者的参与方式及偏好匹配?
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Jun;33(3):708-715. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1146-7.
7
Delivering patient-centered care through shared decision making in overactive bladder.通过共同决策实现膀胱过度活动症的以患者为中心的护理。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Apr;41(4):884-893. doi: 10.1002/nau.24915. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
8
Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.手术中的共同决策:患者和外科医生偏好的范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01211-0.
9
Patient autonomy in dentistry: demonstrating the role for shared decision making.牙科中的患者自主权:展示共同决策的作用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01317-5.
10
Preferred and perceived participation roles of oncological patients in medical decision-making: Results of a survey among users of the German Cancer Information Service.肿瘤患者在医疗决策中偏好和感知的参与角色:德国癌症信息服务用户调查的结果。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Aug;172:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.026. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Power asymmetry and embarrassment in shared decision-making: predicting participation preference and decisional conflict.共同决策中的权力不对称与尴尬:预测参与偏好和决策冲突
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 10;25(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02938-4.
2
[Urinary diversion in old patients (80+ years)].老年患者(80岁及以上)的尿路改道
Urologie. 2024 Aug;63(8):795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00120-024-02384-6. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
3
Choosing between Orthotopic Neobladder and Ileal Conduit after Radical Cystectomy: Tools for Assessing Patient-Specific Characteristics and Enhancing the Decision-Making Process-A Review of Current Studies.根治性膀胱切除术后原位新膀胱与回肠膀胱术的选择:评估患者特异性特征及优化决策过程的工具——当前研究综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 15;13(12):3506. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123506.
4
Getting specific: participation preference in urooncological decision-making.具体来说:参与尿路上皮癌决策的偏好。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02201-8.

本文引用的文献

1
When attitudes and beliefs get in the way of shared decision-making: A mediation analysis of participation preference.当态度和信念阻碍共同决策时:参与偏好的中介分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):740-751. doi: 10.1111/hex.13699. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
2
Patients' perspective on shared decision-making in urology: a prospective study at a university hospital.患者对泌尿外科中共同决策的看法:一家大学医院的前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2021 Dec;39(12):4491-4498. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03794-3. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
3
Decision Aids for Shared Decision-making in Uro-oncology: A Systematic Review.泌尿肿瘤学中共同决策的决策辅助工具:系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 May;8(3):851-869. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 May 10.
4
Shared Decision Making during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的共享决策
Med Decis Making. 2021 May;41(4):430-438. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211004147. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
5
Predicting decisional conflict: Anxiety and depression in shared decision making.预测决策冲突:共决中的焦虑和抑郁。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):1229-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.037. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
6
The Treatment Decision-making Preferences of Patients with Prostate Cancer Should Be Recorded in Research and Clinical Routine: a Pooled Analysis of Four Survey Studies with 7169 Patients.前列腺癌患者的治疗决策偏好应在研究和临床常规中记录:四项调查研究中 7169 例患者的汇总分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Jun;37(3):675-682. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01867-2. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
7
Cancer patients' preferred and perceived level of involvement in treatment decision-making: an epidemiological study.癌症患者对治疗决策参与的偏好和感知水平:一项流行病学研究。
Acta Oncol. 2020 Aug;59(8):967-974. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1762926. Epub 2020 May 19.
8
What's the Risk? Fearful Individuals Generally Overestimate Negative Outcomes and They Dread Outcomes of Specific Events.风险是什么?恐惧的个体通常会高估负面结果,并且害怕特定事件的结果。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 30;10:1676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01676. eCollection 2019.
9
The role of emotions in cancer patients' decision-making.情绪在癌症患者决策中的作用。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 Mar 28;13:914. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.914. eCollection 2019.
10
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.