Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Oct;151(10):2448-2465. doi: 10.1037/xge0001215. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
Human beings regularly "mentally travel" to past and future times in memory and imagination. In theory, whether an event is remembered or imagined (its "mnemicity") underspecifies whether it is oriented toward the past or the future (its "temporality"). However, it remains unclear to what extent the temporal orientation of such episodic simulations is cognitively represented separately from their status as memory or imagination. To address this question, we investigated to what extent episodic simulations are distinguishable in recall by virtue of both temporal orientation and mnemicity. In three experiments ( = 360), participants were asked to generate and later recall events differing along the lines of temporal orientation (past/future) and mnemicity (remembered/imagined). Across all of our experiments, we found that mnemicity and temporality each contributed to participants' ability to discriminate different types of event simulations in recall. However, participants were also consistently more likely to confuse in recall event simulations that shared the same temporal orientation rather than the same mnemicity. These results show that the temporal orientation of episodic simulations can be cognitively represented separately from their mnemicity and have implications for debates about the structure of episodic representations as well as the role of temporality in this structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
人类经常在记忆和想象中“心理上”往返于过去和未来的时间。从理论上讲,事件是被记住还是被想象(其“记忆性”)并没有具体说明它是面向过去还是未来(其“时间性”)。然而,对于这种情景模拟的时间方向在多大程度上与记忆或想象的状态分开进行认知表示,目前还不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们调查了情景模拟在回忆中通过时间方向和记忆性来区分的程度。在三个实验(n = 360)中,参与者被要求生成并回忆具有时间取向(过去/未来)和记忆性(记住/想象)差异的事件。在我们所有的实验中,我们发现记忆性和时间性都有助于参与者在回忆中区分不同类型的事件模拟。然而,参与者也总是更有可能在回忆中混淆具有相同时间取向而不是相同记忆性的情景模拟。这些结果表明,情景模拟的时间方向可以与它们的记忆性分开进行认知表示,这对情景表示结构以及时间性在这种结构中的作用的争论具有影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。