• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内姆尼希提(Mnemicity)与暂存性:区分情节再现的成分。

Mnemicity versus temporality: Distinguishing between components of episodic representations.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Oct;151(10):2448-2465. doi: 10.1037/xge0001215. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1037/xge0001215
PMID:35324239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9489600/
Abstract

Human beings regularly "mentally travel" to past and future times in memory and imagination. In theory, whether an event is remembered or imagined (its "mnemicity") underspecifies whether it is oriented toward the past or the future (its "temporality"). However, it remains unclear to what extent the temporal orientation of such episodic simulations is cognitively represented separately from their status as memory or imagination. To address this question, we investigated to what extent episodic simulations are distinguishable in recall by virtue of both temporal orientation and mnemicity. In three experiments ( = 360), participants were asked to generate and later recall events differing along the lines of temporal orientation (past/future) and mnemicity (remembered/imagined). Across all of our experiments, we found that mnemicity and temporality each contributed to participants' ability to discriminate different types of event simulations in recall. However, participants were also consistently more likely to confuse in recall event simulations that shared the same temporal orientation rather than the same mnemicity. These results show that the temporal orientation of episodic simulations can be cognitively represented separately from their mnemicity and have implications for debates about the structure of episodic representations as well as the role of temporality in this structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

人类经常在记忆和想象中“心理上”往返于过去和未来的时间。从理论上讲,事件是被记住还是被想象(其“记忆性”)并没有具体说明它是面向过去还是未来(其“时间性”)。然而,对于这种情景模拟的时间方向在多大程度上与记忆或想象的状态分开进行认知表示,目前还不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们调查了情景模拟在回忆中通过时间方向和记忆性来区分的程度。在三个实验(n = 360)中,参与者被要求生成并回忆具有时间取向(过去/未来)和记忆性(记住/想象)差异的事件。在我们所有的实验中,我们发现记忆性和时间性都有助于参与者在回忆中区分不同类型的事件模拟。然而,参与者也总是更有可能在回忆中混淆具有相同时间取向而不是相同记忆性的情景模拟。这些结果表明,情景模拟的时间方向可以与它们的记忆性分开进行认知表示,这对情景表示结构以及时间性在这种结构中的作用的争论具有影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Mnemicity versus temporality: Distinguishing between components of episodic representations.内姆尼希提(Mnemicity)与暂存性:区分情节再现的成分。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Oct;151(10):2448-2465. doi: 10.1037/xge0001215. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away: How temporal are episodic contents?很久以前,在一个遥远的星系:情景内容的时间性如何?
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Nov;96:103224. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103224. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
3
Mnemicity: A Cognitive Gadget?记忆性:一种认知工具?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;18(5):1160-1177. doi: 10.1177/17456916221141352. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
4
How to Become a Memory: The Individual and Collective Aspects of Mnemicity.如何成为记忆:记忆的个体和集体方面。
Top Cogn Sci. 2024 Apr;16(2):225-240. doi: 10.1111/tops.12646. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
Relational processing demands and the role of spatial context in the construction of episodic simulations.关系加工需求和空间语境在情景模拟构建中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Aug;46(8):1424-1441. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000831. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
6
Episodic elaboration: Investigating the structure of retrieved past events and imagined future events.情景详述:探究所检索到的过去事件与想象中的未来事件的结构。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 May;33:112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
7
The temporal compression of events during episodic future thinking.事件在情景性未来思维中的时间压缩。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104416. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104416. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
8
Imagining the personal past: Episodic counterfactuals compared to episodic memories and episodic future projections.想象个人的过去:情景反事实与情景记忆和情景未来投射的比较。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Apr;45(3):375-389. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0671-2.
9
The devil is in the details: Comparisons of episodic simulations of positive and negative future events.细节决定成败:积极和消极未来事件的情景模拟比较。
Emotion. 2017 Aug;17(5):867-873. doi: 10.1037/emo0000294. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
Imagining novel futures: the roles of event plausibility and familiarity.想象新颖的未来:事件似真性和熟悉性的作用。
Memory. 2012 Jul;20(5):443-51. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.677450. Epub 2012 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Creative Evaluation: The Role of Memory in Novelty & Effectiveness Judgements.创造性评估:记忆在新颖性和有效性判断中的作用。
Creat Res J. 2024 Mar 5. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2024.2322856.
2
Episodic recombination and the role of time in mental travel.片段重组与时间在心理旅行中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Nov 4;379(1913):20230409. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0409. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
3
Mnemicity: A Cognitive Gadget?记忆性:一种认知工具?

本文引用的文献

1
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away: How temporal are episodic contents?很久以前,在一个遥远的星系:情景内容的时间性如何?
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Nov;96:103224. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103224. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
2
Divergent thinking and constructing future events: dissociating old from new ideas.发散思维与构建未来事件:区分新旧想法。
Memory. 2021 Jul;29(6):729-743. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1940205. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
3
How people keep track of what is real and what is imagined: The epistemic status of counterfactual alternatives to reality.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;18(5):1160-1177. doi: 10.1177/17456916221141352. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
人们如何跟踪真实和想象的事物:对现实的反事实替代物的认识状态。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Apr;47(4):547-570. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000965. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
4
More time for science: Using Testable to create and share behavioral experiments faster, recruit better participants, and engage students in hands-on research.更多的科学时间:使用 Testable 更快地创建和分享行为实验,招募更好的参与者,并让学生参与实践研究。
Prog Brain Res. 2020;253:243-262. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
5
The Phenomenology of Remembering Is an Epistemic Feeling.记忆的现象学是一种认知感受。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 3;11:1531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01531. eCollection 2020.
6
Zooming In and Out on One's Life: Autobiographical Representations at Multiple Time Scales.关注人生的多个时间尺度:自传体表象。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Nov;32(11):2037-2055. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01556. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
7
The dimensions of episodic simulation.情景模拟的维度。
Cognition. 2020 Mar;196:104085. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104085. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
8
Thinking in and about time: A dual systems perspective on temporal cognition.思维的时间与关于时间:时间认知的双重系统观点。
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Sep 25;42:e244. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18002157.
9
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales.格拉斯哥规范:9 个尺度上对 5500 个单词的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1258-1270. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3.
10
Déjà Vu: An Illusion of Prediction.似曾相识:一种预测的错觉。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;29(4):635-644. doi: 10.1177/0956797617743018. Epub 2018 Mar 1.