Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Memory. 2021 Jul;29(6):729-743. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1940205. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
Divergent thinking (the ability to generate creative ideas by combining diverse types of information) has been previously linked to the ability to imagine novel and specific future autobiographical events. Here, we examined whether divergent thinking is differentially associated with the ability to construct novel imagined future events and recast future events (i.e., actual past events recast as future events) as opposed to recalled past events. We also examined whether different types of creative ideas (i.e., old ideas from memory or new ideas from imagination) underlie the linkage between divergent thinking and various autobiographical events. Divergent thinking ability was measured using the Alternate Uses Task (AUT). In Experiment 1, the amount of episodic details for both novel and recast future events was associated with divergent thinking (AUT scores), and this relationship was significant with AUT scores for new creative ideas but not old creative ideas. There was no significant relationship between divergent thinking and the amount of episodic detail for recalled past events. We extended these findings in Experiment 2 to a different test of divergent thinking, the Consequences Task. These results demonstrate that individual differences in divergent thinking are associated with the capacity to both imagine and recast future events.
发散思维(通过组合不同类型的信息来产生创意的能力)先前与想象新颖和具体的未来自传事件的能力有关。在这里,我们研究了发散思维是否与构建新颖的想象未来事件和重铸未来事件(即将实际的过去事件重铸为未来事件)的能力而不是回忆过去事件的能力存在差异。我们还研究了不同类型的创意(即来自记忆的旧创意或来自想象的新创意)是否是发散思维与各种自传事件之间联系的基础。发散思维能力使用替代用途任务(AUT)进行衡量。在实验 1 中,新颖和重铸未来事件的情节细节数量与发散思维(AUT 分数)相关,并且这种关系在新创意的 AUT 分数上是显著的,但在旧创意的 AUT 分数上不显著。发散思维与回忆过去事件的情节细节数量之间没有显著关系。我们在实验 2 中将这些发现扩展到了发散思维的另一个测试——后果任务。这些结果表明,发散思维的个体差异与想象和重铸未来事件的能力有关。