Canchola Alexa, Meletz Ruth, Khandakar Riste Ara, Woods Megan, Lin Ying-Hsuan
Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, CA, United States of America.
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265365. eCollection 2022.
Nearly two years after vitamin E acetate (VEA) was identified as the potential cause of the 2019-2020 outbreak of e-cigarette, or vaping product-associated lung injuries (EVALI), the toxicity mechanisms of VEA vaping are still yet to be fully understood. Studies since the outbreak have found that e-liquids such as VEA undergo thermal degradation during the vaping process to produce various degradation products, which may pose a greater risk of toxicity than exposure to unvaped VEA. Additionally, a wide range of customizable parameters-including the model of e-cigarette used, puffing topography, or the applied power/temperature used to generate aerosols-have been found to influence the physical properties and chemical compositions of vaping emissions. However, the impact of heating coil temperature on the chemical composition of VEA vaping emissions has not been fully assessed. In this study, we investigated the emission product distribution of VEA vaping emissions produced at temperatures ranging from 176 to 356°C, corresponding to a variable voltage vape pen set at 3.3 to 4.8V. VEA degradation was found to be greatly enhanced with increasing temperature, resulting in a shift towards the production of lower molecular weight compounds, such as the redox active duroquinone (DQ) and short-chain alkenes. Low temperature vaping of VEA resulted in the production of long-chain molecules, such as phytol, exposure to which has been suggested to induce lung damage in previous studies. Furthermore, differential product distribution was observed in VEA degradation products generated from vaping and from pyrolysis using a tube furnace in the absence of the heating coil at equivalent temperatures, suggesting the presence of external factors such as metals or oxidation that may enhance VEA degradation during vaping. Overall, our findings indicate that vaping behavior may significantly impact the risk of exposure to toxic vaping products and potential for vaping-related health concerns.
在维生素E醋酸酯(VEA)被确定为2019 - 2020年电子烟或雾化产品相关肺损伤(EVALI)爆发的潜在原因近两年后,VEA雾化的毒性机制仍未完全了解。自疫情爆发以来的研究发现,诸如VEA之类的电子烟液在雾化过程中会发生热降解,产生各种降解产物,这些降解产物可能比未雾化的VEA暴露带来更大的毒性风险。此外,已发现一系列可定制参数,包括使用的电子烟型号、抽吸形态或用于产生气溶胶的施加功率/温度,都会影响雾化排放物的物理性质和化学成分。然而,加热线圈温度对VEA雾化排放物化学成分的影响尚未得到充分评估。在本研究中,我们调查了在176至356°C温度范围内产生的VEA雾化排放物的排放产物分布,这对应于设置为3.3至4.8V的可变电压电子烟笔。发现随着温度升高,VEA降解大大增强,导致向较低分子量化合物的生成转变,例如氧化还原活性的杜醌(DQ)和短链烯烃。VEA的低温雾化导致长链分子的产生,例如植醇,在先前的研究中已表明接触植醇会诱发肺损伤。此外,在等效温度下,在不存在加热线圈的情况下,使用管式炉对VEA进行雾化和热解产生的降解产物中观察到了不同的产物分布,这表明存在诸如金属或氧化等外部因素,可能会增强雾化过程中VEA的降解。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,雾化行为可能会显著影响接触有毒雾化产品的风险以及与雾化相关的健康问题发生的可能性。