Suppr超能文献

测试基于正念的试点项目在城市学校青年中的可行性和潜在影响。

Testing the Feasibility and Potential Impact of a Mindfulness-Based Pilot Program in Urban School Youth.

机构信息

Nutrition Program, Hunter College, City University of New York, 2180 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10035, USA.

School of Public Health, City University of New York, 2180 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10035, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 15;19(6):3464. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063464.

Abstract

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) could be effective in engaging children and reducing childhood obesity risk. The purpose of this study was to test feasibility, fidelity, and potential impact of a pilot MBI in urban school youth. A two-group quasi-experimental study was conducted in a Harlem, New York school. Participants comprised 51 students (ages 9-12, 54% female, 85% African American/Black). The experimental (E) group ( = 26) participated in a nine-session pilot MBI. Sessions were 90 min and offered weekly as part of afterschool programming. Children only attending during the school day comprised the control (C) group ( = 25). Process evaluation (e.g., fidelity, reach) was performed. Interviews with the E group were conducted to determine program acceptability. Mindful eating and resilience measures were collected at baseline and post-intervention. Intervention feasibility was high as the retention rate was 100% and fidelity was good as nine out of ten sessions were implemented. Relative to baseline, significant improvements were observed in the C group compared to the E group in the resilience composite score ( = 0.01) and its confidence domain ( = 0.01). A MBI may provide a unique opportunity to engage youth. However, further research is warranted to determine if a MBI could promote health in urban, school-age children.

摘要

基于正念的干预措施(MBI)可能有助于吸引儿童并降低儿童肥胖风险。本研究旨在测试在纽约哈莱姆区一所学校的青少年中进行试点 MBIs 的可行性、保真度和潜在影响。采用了两组准实验设计。参与者包括 51 名学生(年龄 9-12 岁,54%为女性,85%为非裔美国人/黑人)。实验组(n=26)参加了九节试点 MBIs。每次课程持续 90 分钟,每周作为课后项目的一部分提供。只在上学日上课的儿童组成对照组(n=25)。进行了过程评估(例如,保真度、覆盖范围)。对实验组进行了访谈以确定方案的可接受性。在基线和干预后收集了正念饮食和适应力的测量结果。与基线相比,对照组(C 组)的适应力综合评分( = 0.01)及其信心域( = 0.01)显著提高,而实验组(E 组)则没有显著变化。MBI 可能为吸引青少年提供了独特的机会。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定 MBIs 是否可以促进城市学龄儿童的健康。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验