Department of Social Epidemiology, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, 75646 Paris, France.
EHESP School of Public Health, 35043 Rennes, France.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3534. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063534.
Background-The exposome concept refers to the totality of exposures from internal and external sources, including chemical and biological agents from conception throughout the lifetime. Exposome is also made up of psychosocial components such as socio-economic status (SES), which will focus on in this review. Despite exposures to the same environmental nuisances, individuals and groups are impacted differently. According to the literature, health inequalities exist among different socioeconomic groups, and SES may influence the association between environmental nuisances and health outcomes. However, the variation of this interaction across ages has rarely been studied. There is a need to adopt a life course approach to understand the history of diseases better. Objective-The main objective of this review is to document how SES could modify the association between environmental nuisances and health outcomes, across different ages, as a first crucial step introducing the emerged concept of social exposome. Methods-The PubMed database was searched from January 2010 to August 2021 for systematic reviews published in English addressing the interaction between SES, environmental nuisances, and health outcomes. Socio-economic indicators considered include education, level of income, neighborhood environment. Environmental nuisances considered many environment nuisances, mainly air pollution and noise. Results-Among 242 literature reviews identified, 11 of them address the question of the effect modification. Overall, our work reveals that environmental nuisances were mostly associated with poorer health outcomes and that SES modified this association, increasing the health risk among the poorest. Very interestingly, our work reports the existence of this interaction across different ages, including pregnancy, childhood, and adulthood, and for various environmental nuisances. Conclusion-In conclusion, our work confirms that we are not all equal to face environmental nuisances. The poorest are more vulnerable to the health effect of environmental nuisances. Policy decisions and interventions should target this high-risk population as a priority. Further investigations are needed to formalize the concept of social exposome more precisely and then communicate about it.
背景-外显组概念是指来自内部和外部来源的暴露总和,包括从受孕到整个生命周期的化学和生物制剂。外显组还包括社会经济地位(SES)等心理社会因素,本综述将重点关注 SES。尽管暴露于相同的环境危害中,个体和群体受到的影响不同。根据文献,不同社会经济群体之间存在健康不平等,SES 可能会影响环境危害与健康结果之间的关联。然而,这种相互作用在不同年龄段的变化很少被研究。需要采用生命历程方法更好地了解疾病的历史。目的-本综述的主要目的是记录 SES 如何在不同年龄段改变环境危害与健康结果之间的关联,作为引入新兴社会外显组概念的第一步。方法-从 2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 8 月,在 PubMed 数据库中搜索了以英语发表的关于 SES、环境危害和健康结果之间相互作用的系统综述。考虑的社会经济指标包括教育程度、收入水平、邻里环境。考虑的环境危害包括许多环境危害,主要是空气污染和噪音。结果-在确定的 242 篇文献综述中,有 11 篇探讨了 SES 对环境危害与健康结果之间相互作用的影响修饰作用。总体而言,我们的工作表明,环境危害主要与较差的健康结果相关,而 SES 会改变这种关联,使最贫困者面临更大的健康风险。非常有趣的是,我们的工作报告了这种相互作用存在于不同年龄段,包括妊娠、儿童期和成年期,以及各种环境危害。结论-总之,我们的工作证实,我们并非都能平等地面对环境危害。最贫困者更容易受到环境危害对健康的影响。政策决策和干预措施应优先针对这一高风险人群。需要进一步的研究来更准确地确定社会外显组的概念,然后进行宣传。