Suppr超能文献

医用/外科口罩、布口罩和FFP/(K)N95口罩:揭开偏好、SARS-CoV-2传播性及呼吸副作用的面纱

Medical/Surgical, Cloth and FFP/(K)N95 Masks: Unmasking Preference, SARS-CoV-2 Transmissibility and Respiratory Side Effects.

作者信息

Mouliou Dimitra S, Pantazopoulos Ioannis, Gourgoulianis Konstantinos I

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, 41110 Larissa, Greece.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, 41110 Larissa, Greece.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 22;12(3):325. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030325.

Abstract

Background: Social distancing and mask-wearing were recommended and mandatory for people during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A web-based questionnaire was disseminated through social media assessing mask type preference and COVID-19 history amongst tertiary sector services and the rates of the triad of respiratory symptoms in each mask type, along with other respiratory-related parameters. Results: Amongst 4107 participants, 63.4% of the responders, mainly women, preferred medical/surgical masks; 20.5%, mainly men, preferred cotton cloth masks; and 13.8% preferred FFP/(K)N95 masks. COVID-19 history was less common in FFP/(K)N95 compared to medical/surgical (9.2% vs. 15.6%, p < 0.001) or cloth masks (9.2% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.006). Compared to the control group (rare mask-wearing, nonsmokers and without lung conditions), those wearing one medical mask were more likely to report frequent sputum production (4.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.026) and frequent cough (4.4% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.013), and those wearing FFP/(K)N95 masks were more likely to report frequent cough (4.1% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.048). Compared to the control group, those preferring cotton cloth masks were more likely to report a frequent cough (7.3% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.0002), sputum production (6.3% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.003) and dyspnea (8% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.00001). Conclusions: Safe mask-wearing should be in parallel with a more personalized and social interaction approach.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,建议并强制人们保持社交距离和佩戴口罩。方法:通过社交媒体分发了一份基于网络的问卷,评估第三产业服务人员对口罩类型的偏好、新冠病史以及每种口罩类型下呼吸道症状三联征的发生率,以及其他与呼吸相关的参数。结果:在4107名参与者中,63.4%的应答者(主要为女性)更喜欢医用/外科口罩;20.5%(主要为男性)更喜欢棉布口罩;13.8%更喜欢FFP/(K)N95口罩。与医用/外科口罩(9.2%对15.6%,p<0.001)或布口罩(9.2%对14.4%,p = 0.006)相比,FFP/(K)N95口罩使用者的新冠病史较少见。与对照组(很少戴口罩、不吸烟且无肺部疾病)相比,佩戴一个医用口罩的人更有可能报告经常咳痰(4.4%对1.9%,p = 0.026)和经常咳嗽(4.4%对1.6%,p = 0.013),而佩戴FFP/(K)N95口罩的人更有可能报告经常咳嗽(4.1%对1.6%,p = 0.048)。与对照组相比,更喜欢棉布口罩的人更有可能报告经常咳嗽(7.3%对1.6%,p = 0.0002)、咳痰(6.3%对1.9%,p = 0.003)和呼吸困难(8%对1.3%,p = 0.00001)。结论:安全佩戴口罩应与更个性化和社交互动的方法并行。

相似文献

3
Effectiveness of surgical, KF94, and N95 respirator masks in blocking SARS-CoV-2: a controlled comparison in 7 patients.
Infect Dis (Lond). 2020 Nov-Dec;52(12):908-912. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2020.1810858. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
4
An epidemiological study on face masks and acne in a Nigerian population.
PLoS One. 2022 May 19;17(5):e0268224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268224. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Dec;109(12):1522-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
6
Effectiveness of cloth face masks to prevent viral spread: a meta-analysis.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 Feb 23;46(1):e84-e90. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad205.
7
Physio-metabolic and clinical consequences of wearing face masks-Systematic review with meta-analysis and comprehensive evaluation.
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 5;11:1125150. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1125150. eCollection 2023.
8
Physiological Effects of Surgical and N95 Masks During Exercise in the COVID-19 era.
Am J Med Sci. 2022 May;363(5):411-419. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
9
What is suitable social distancing for people wearing face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Indoor Air. 2022 Jan;32(1):e12935. doi: 10.1111/ina.12935. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
10
How the public used face masks in China during the coronavirus disease pandemic: A survey study.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Mar;115:103853. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103853. Epub 2020 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

3
Effect of Surgical Masks and N95 Respirators on Anxiety.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Mar 8;20:551-559. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S447428. eCollection 2024.
6
Cutting-Edge Approaches in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.
J Pers Med. 2023 Jan 3;13(1):105. doi: 10.3390/jpm13010105.
8
Inhaled CO Concentration While Wearing Face Masks: A Pilot Study Using Capnography.
Environ Health Insights. 2022 Sep 15;16:11786302221123573. doi: 10.1177/11786302221123573. eCollection 2022.
9
Current Evidence in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines and Post-Vaccination Adverse Reports: Knowns and Unknowns.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 26;12(7):1555. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071555.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Response to the Vaccine against COVID-19: The Underrated Power of Influence.
J Pers Med. 2021 Dec 29;12(1):15. doi: 10.3390/jpm12010015.
2
COVID-19 'asymptomatic' patients: an old wives' tale.
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2022 Apr;16(4):399-407. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2022.2030224. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
3
Societal Criticism towards COVID-19: Assessing the Theory of Self-Diagnosis Contrasted to Medical Diagnosis.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 27;11(10):1777. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101777.
4
Side-Effects of Public Health Policies Against Covid-19: The Story of an Over-Reaction.
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 13;9:696818. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.696818. eCollection 2021.
5
Estimates of COVID-19 Risk Factors among Social Strata and Predictors for a Vulnerability to the Infection.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 18;18(16):8701. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168701.
6
Healthcare professionals' knowledge, perception and practice towards COVID-19: A cross-sectional web-survey.
J Pharm Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 14;11(4):355-363. doi: 10.1111/jphs.12385. eCollection 2020 Nov.
7
Is a Mask That Covers the Mouth and Nose Free from Undesirable Side Effects in Everyday Use and Free of Potential Hazards?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;18(8):4344. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084344.
8
False-positive and false-negative COVID-19 cases: respiratory prevention and management strategies, vaccination, and further perspectives.
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021 Aug;15(8):993-1002. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1917389. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
10
An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014564118.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验