Linder Sora, Walle Leonard, Loucas Marios, Loucas Rafael, Frerichs Onno, Fansa Hisham
Department of Plastic Surgery and Breast Center, Spital Zollikerberg, 8125 Zollikerberg, Switzerland.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Klinikum Bielefeld, OWL-University, 33604 Bielefeld, Germany.
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 25;12(3):347. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030347.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is established for autologous breast reconstruction. ERAS leads to a shortened hospital stay and improved outcome after elective surgery. In this retrospective, two-center case−control study, we compared two different treatment regimens for patients undergoing a DIEP-flap breast reconstruction from two centers, one with an established ERAS protocol and one without. All patients with DIEP breast reconstructions over the period of 12 months were included. The primary outcome measure was the length of hospital stay (LOS) in days. A total of 79 patients with 95 DIEP-flaps were analyzed. In group A (ERAS) 42 patients were operated with DIEP flaps, in group B (non-ERAS) 37 patients. LOS was significantly reduced in the ERAS group (4.51 days) compared to the non-ERAS group (6.32; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that, in group A, LOS is significantly affected by surgery duration. BMI in the ERAS group had no effect on LOS. In group B a higher BMI resulted in a significantly higher LOS. In multivariate analysis, neither age nor type for surgery (primary/secondary/after neoadjuvant therapy, etc.) affected LOS. In both groups, no systemic or flap-related complications were observed. Comparing two reconstructive centers with and without implemented ERAS, ERAS led to a significantly decreased LOS for all patients. ERAS implementation does not result in an increased complication rate or flap loss. Postoperative pain can be well managed with basic analgesia using NSAID when intraoperative blocks are applied. The reduced use of opioids was well tolerated. With implementation of ERAS the recovery experience can be enhanced making autologous breast reconstructions more available and attractive for various patients.
加速康复外科(ERAS)已应用于自体乳房重建。ERAS可缩短择期手术后的住院时间并改善预后。在这项回顾性、双中心病例对照研究中,我们比较了两个中心接受腹壁下动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建患者的两种不同治疗方案,一个中心采用既定的ERAS方案,另一个中心未采用。纳入了12个月内所有接受DIEP乳房重建的患者。主要结局指标为住院天数(LOS)。共分析了79例患者的95个DIEP皮瓣。A组(ERAS组)42例患者接受了DIEP皮瓣手术,B组(非ERAS组)37例患者。与非ERAS组(6.32天;p<0.001)相比,ERAS组的LOS显著缩短(4.51天)。多因素分析显示,在A组中,LOS受手术时长的显著影响。ERAS组的体重指数(BMI)对LOS无影响。在B组中,较高的BMI导致LOS显著延长。多因素分析中,年龄和手术类型(初次/二次/新辅助治疗后等)均不影响LOS。两组均未观察到全身或皮瓣相关并发症。比较实施和未实施ERAS的两个重建中心,ERAS使所有患者的LOS显著缩短。实施ERAS不会导致并发症发生率增加或皮瓣丢失。术中应用阻滞时,使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)进行基础镇痛可良好控制术后疼痛。减少阿片类药物的使用耐受性良好。随着ERAS的实施,康复体验可得到改善,使自体乳房重建对各类患者更可行且更具吸引力。