Cunradi Carol B, Dellor Elinam, Alter Harrison J, Caetano Raul, Mair Christina
Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation, Berkeley, CA.
College of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Partner Abuse. 2020;11(1):57-75. doi: 10.1891/1946-6560.11.1.57.
Despite evidence that most who perpetrate intimate partner violence (IPV) also report victimization, little is known about bidirectional IPV among Emergency Department (ED) patients and its association with problem drinking and marijuana use. We conducted an observational, cross-sectional survey among low- and moderate-acuity patients at a Northern California safety-net ED. Physical IPV was measured with the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2). We recorded patient's frequency of intoxication and marijuana use. Spouse/partner's problem drinking and marijuana use were measured dichotomously. Odds Ratios [ORs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs] were estimated using multinomial logistic regression models of unidirectional and bidirectional IPV. Among 1,037 patients (53% female), perpetration only, victimization only, and bidirectional IPV were reported by 3.8%, 6.2%, and 13.3% of the sample, respectively. Frequency of intoxication was associated with perpetration (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.92) and bidirectional IPV (OR=1.34; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.58). Days of marijuana use were associated with bidirectional IPV (OR=1.15; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.28). Patients whose partners were problem drinkers were at risk for victimization (OR=2.56; 95% CI=1.38, 4.76) and bidirectional IPV (OR=1.97; 95% CI 1.18, 3.27). Among patients who reported any past-year IPV, most experienced bidirectional aggression. ED staff should consider asking patients who are married, cohabiting, or in a dating relationship about their experience with past-year IPV and inquire about their substance use patterns and those of their romantic partner, to share information about potential linkages. Medical and recreational marijuana legalization trends underscore the importance of further research on IPV and marijuana.
尽管有证据表明,大多数实施亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的人也报告曾是受害者,但对于急诊科(ED)患者中的双向IPV及其与问题饮酒和使用大麻之间的关联,我们却知之甚少。我们在北加利福尼亚州一家安全网急诊科对低 acuity 和中等 acuity 患者进行了一项观察性横断面调查。使用修订后的冲突策略量表(CTS2)来衡量身体 IPV。我们记录了患者的醉酒频率和大麻使用情况。配偶/伴侣的问题饮酒和大麻使用情况采用二分法进行衡量。使用单向和双向 IPV 的多项逻辑回归模型估计优势比[ORs]和 95%置信区间[CIs]。在 1037 名患者(53%为女性)中,样本中分别有 3.8%、6.2%和 13.3%报告仅实施暴力、仅遭受暴力和双向 IPV。醉酒频率与实施暴力(OR 1.50;95% CI 1.18 至 1.92)和双向 IPV(OR = 1.34;95% CI 1.13 至 1.58)相关。大麻使用天数与双向 IPV 相关(OR = 1.15;95% CI 1.03 至 1.28)。伴侣有问题饮酒的患者存在遭受暴力(OR = 2.56;95% CI = 1.38,4.76)和双向 IPV(OR = 1.97;95% CI 1.18,3.27)的风险。在报告过去一年有任何 IPV 的患者中,大多数经历过双向攻击。急诊科工作人员应考虑询问已婚、同居或处于恋爱关系的患者过去一年的 IPV 经历,并询问他们及其恋爱伴侣的物质使用模式,以分享有关潜在联系的信息。医用和娱乐用大麻合法化趋势凸显了进一步研究 IPV 与大麻关系的重要性。