Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 2150 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 601, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.
Andrew Levitt Center for Social Emergency Medicine, Berkeley, CA 94703, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 30;18(1):222. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010222.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive public health problem. Within the U.S., urban emergency department (ED) patients have elevated prevalence of IPV, substance use, and other social problems compared to those in the general household population. Using a social-ecological framework, this cross-sectional study analyzes the extent to which individual, household, and neighborhood factors are associated with the frequency of IPV among a socially disadvantaged sample of urban ED patients. Confidential survey interviews were conducted with 1037 married/partnered study participants (46% male; 50% Hispanic; 29% African American) at a public safety-net hospital. Gender-stratified multilevel Tobit regression models were estimated for frequency of past-year physical IPV (perpetration and victimization) and frequency of severe IPV. Approximately 23% of participants reported IPV. Among men and women, impulsivity, adverse childhood experiences, substance use, and their spouse/partner's hazardous drinking were associated with IPV frequency. Additionally, household food insufficiency, being fired or laid off from their job, perceived neighborhood disorder, and neighborhood demographic characteristics were associated with IPV frequency among women. Similar patterns were observed in models of severe IPV frequency. IPV prevention strategies implemented in urban ED settings should address the individual, household, and neighborhood risk factors that are linked with partner aggression among socially disadvantaged couples.
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个普遍存在的公共卫生问题。在美国,与一般家庭人口相比,城市急诊部(ED)患者的 IPV、药物使用和其他社会问题的发生率更高。本研究采用社会生态学框架,分析个体、家庭和社区因素与社会劣势的城市 ED 患者中 IPV 发生频率之间的关联程度。对一家公共保障医院的 1037 名已婚/有伴侣的研究参与者(46%为男性;50%为西班牙裔;29%为非裔美国人)进行了保密的问卷调查访谈。针对过去一年的身体 IPV(施暴和受害)和严重 IPV 的发生频率,进行了性别分层多水平 Tobit 回归模型估计。约 23%的参与者报告了 IPV。在男性和女性中,冲动、不良童年经历、药物使用以及其配偶/伴侣的危险饮酒与 IPV 发生频率相关。此外,家庭食物不足、失业或下岗、感知到的邻里混乱以及邻里人口特征与女性的 IPV 发生频率相关。在严重 IPV 频率模型中也观察到类似的模式。在城市 ED 环境中实施的 IPV 预防策略应针对与社会劣势夫妇中伴侣攻击相关的个体、家庭和社区风险因素。