Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation, Berkeley, California.
Andrew Levitt Center for Social Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital - Alameda Health System, Oakland, California.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Nov;81(6):780-789. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.780.
This cross-sectional study evaluates the association between physical intimate partner violence (IPV) and frequencies of drinking and volume consumed in six different contexts among a sample of urban emergency department (ED) patients.
We obtained survey data from 1,037 married, cohabiting, or partnered patients (53% female; 50% Hispanic; 29% African American) at a Northern California safety-net hospital. Past-year physical IPV was measured with the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale. We asked patients about frequency of drinking and usual number of drinks consumed at bars, restaurants, homes of friends or relatives, own home, public places such as street corners or parking lots, and community centers or large events. Gender-stratified dose-response models were estimated for frequencies of IPV perpetration and victimization, with adjustment for sociodemographic and psychosocial factors, marijuana use, and spouse/partner problem drinking.
None of the women's context-based frequency and volume measures were associated with frequency of IPV victimization. Women's volume of alcohol consumed at home was associated positively with frequency of their IPV perpetration (β = .008, SE = .003, p < .01), and volume consumed in public places was associated negatively with this outcome (β = -.023, SE = .010, p < .05). Among men, none of the context-based frequency and volume measures were associated with frequency of either IPV outcome. Spouse/partner's problem drinking was associated with each gender's IPV victimization, and with IPV perpetration by men.
Frequency of drinking and volume consumed in specific contexts do not substantively contribute to frequency of IPV perpetration or victimization in this sample of urban ED patients.
本横断面研究评估了在加利福尼亚北部一家医疗保健系统中,身体亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)与六种不同情境下饮酒频率和饮酒量之间的关系。
我们从 1037 名已婚、同居或伴侣关系的患者(53%为女性;50%为西班牙裔;29%为非裔美国人)中获取了调查数据。使用修订后的冲突策略量表测量过去一年的身体 IPV。我们询问了患者在酒吧、餐馆、朋友或亲戚家、自己家、公共场所(如街角或停车场)和社区中心或大型活动场所的饮酒频率和通常饮酒量。针对 IPV 实施和受害的性别分层剂量反应模型,调整了社会人口统计学和心理社会因素、大麻使用以及配偶/伴侣问题饮酒。
女性基于情境的饮酒频率和饮酒量与 IPV 受害频率均无关联。女性在家中饮酒量与 IPV 实施频率呈正相关(β=0.008,SE=0.003,p<0.01),而在公共场所的饮酒量与该结果呈负相关(β=-0.023,SE=0.010,p<0.05)。在男性中,基于情境的饮酒频率和饮酒量与 IPV 受害频率均无关联。配偶/伴侣的问题饮酒与男女双方的 IPV 受害以及男性的 IPV 实施均有关联。
在本研究中,在特定情境下的饮酒频率和饮酒量与城市急诊患者的 IPV 实施或受害频率没有实质性关联。