Department of Chemistry, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455, USA.
Department of Chemistry, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455, USA.
J Chromatogr A. 2022 May 10;1670:462953. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.462953. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
Due to the recent legalization of medical and recreational Cannabis in many countries in the world, there has been an increasing demand for accurate quantification of a growing number of cannabinoids. To meet this challenge, a method for rapid quantification of up to sixteen cannabinoids using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography diode-array detector (UHPLC-DAD) has been developed, validated and used in the analysis of hemp concentrates. While published LC-UV methods were usually for twelve or less cannabinoids and might not achieve baseline separation of some critical pairs of cannabinoids, e.g., CBG/CBD (cannabigerol/cannabidiol) and Δ-THC/Δ-THC (tetrahydrocannabinol), in this study a systematic separation optimization led to a resolution of 1.7 for both pairs. The linear calibration range of all cannabinoids were between 0.02 to 25 µg/mL in methanol, leading to the quantification of 0.1 to 125% (w/w) individual cannabinoids in hemp concentrates after they were mixed with methanol at 20 µg/mL and analyzed after ultrasonication, centrifugation and filtration. The analytical results showed that none of the nine analyzed samples contained any of the seven acidic cannabinoids, but all the nine neutral cannabinoids were detected, with average content ranging from 0.10 to 93.23% (w/w) and RSD (relative standard deviation) values from 0.3 to 11.2% in triplicates. Particularly, two hemp concentrates, i.e., delta 8 hemp distillate and delta 8 hemp shatter contained 9.35 and 11.33% (w/w) Δ-THC, respectively. While published recovery experiments were limited by the unavailability of cannabinoid-free matrix and the high cost of cannabinoid standards, this problem was solved by spiking abnormal CBD, a cannabinoid not naturally present in Cannabis plants and commercially available with a reasonable price, into the samples. The obtained average recovery ranged from 94.8 to 103.6% with RSD values from 1.5 to 9.0% in triplicates for the nine analyzed samples. Electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI/TOFMS) confirmed the good specificity of the UHPLC-DAD method, i.e., without any false positive identification of individual cannabinoids, and discovered six untargeted cannabinoids that were structural isomers of Δ-THC in the nine hemp concentrate samples.
由于世界上许多国家最近将医用和娱乐用大麻合法化,因此对越来越多种类的大麻素进行准确定量的需求不断增加。为了应对这一挑战,已经开发、验证并用于大麻浓缩物分析的方法是使用超高效液相色谱二极管阵列检测器 (UHPLC-DAD) 快速定量多达十六种大麻素。虽然已发表的 LC-UV 方法通常用于十二种或更少的大麻素,并且可能无法实现某些关键大麻素对(例如 CBG/CBD(大麻二酚/大麻素)和 Δ-THC/Δ-THC(四氢大麻酚))的基线分离,但在本研究中,系统的分离优化导致这两种对都达到了 1.7 的分辨率。所有大麻素在甲醇中的线性校准范围均在 0.02 至 25μg/mL 之间,这使得在将大麻浓缩物与甲醇混合至 20μg/mL 并进行超声处理、离心和过滤后,能够对大麻浓缩物中 0.1 至 125%(w/w)的单个大麻素进行定量。分析结果表明,在所分析的 9 个样品中均未检测到七种酸性大麻素中的任何一种,但均检测到了 9 种中性大麻素,平均含量范围为 0.10 至 93.23%(w/w),相对标准偏差(RSD)值为 0.3 至 11.2%,在重复 3 次的实验中。特别地,两种大麻浓缩物,即 delta 8 大麻馏分和 delta 8 大麻碎片,分别含有 9.35%和 11.33%(w/w)的 Δ-THC。虽然已发表的回收率实验受到缺乏无大麻素基质和大麻素标准品成本高的限制,但通过向样品中添加异常 CBD(一种在大麻植物中不存在且价格合理的商业可得的大麻素)来解决这个问题。在所分析的 9 个样品中,获得的平均回收率范围为 94.8%至 103.6%,相对标准偏差(RSD)值为 1.5%至 9.0%,重复 3 次。电喷雾电离飞行时间质谱 (ESI/TOFMS) 证实了 UHPLC-DAD 方法的良好特异性,即没有任何单个大麻素的假阳性鉴定,并在 9 个大麻浓缩物样品中发现了六个非靶向大麻素,它们是 Δ-THC 的结构异构体。