Suppr超能文献

胸骨后甲状腺肿:解剖学方面和技术要点。

Retrosternal Goitre: Anatomical Aspects and Technical Notes.

机构信息

Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 25;58(3):349. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030349.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: surgery for substernal goitre is still debated in the literature, due to the wide range of surgical options. This article outlines the findings of our extensive experiences, which include 264 cases of patients with “goitre plongeant“, and compares postoperative complications, despite surgical approaches. Material and Methods: preoperative planning and anatomical landmarks are described to determine the potential need of a combined approach. The surgical procedure is described, along with some stratagems, to ensure that the operation is completed safely. A statistical analysis of complications and the length of stay, with a comparison of cervicotomy and combined access, was performed using the Pearson chi-square significance test. Results: 264 patients underwent thyroid surgery for substernal goitre. The Kocher incision was the surgical approach chosen in 256 patients (96.6%), while an accessory incision was performed in 8 patients (3.4%). The necessity to use a two-fold surgical access was linked to a higher rate of postoperative complications (p-value < 0.01). The average length of stay (LOS) for cervicotomy was 2 days (1−3 days), while the average LOS was 5 days (4−7 days) (p-value = n.s.) for combined access. Conclusions: cervicotomy should be the gold standard technique for exploring intrathoracic goitre with a digital dissection, which, in almost all cases, enables the externalization of the mediastinal portion associated. Sternotomy is related to a higher rate of complications, so it should be performed only in selected cases. Management in large-volume centres may be more appropriate.

摘要

背景与目的

由于手术方式多样,胸骨后甲状腺肿的手术治疗在文献中仍存在争议。本文总结了我们的广泛经验,包括 264 例“胸骨后甲状腺肿”患者,比较了不同手术入路的术后并发症。

材料与方法

描述了术前规划和解剖标志,以确定是否需要联合入路。描述了手术过程和一些策略,以确保手术安全完成。采用 Pearson 卡方检验对并发症和住院时间进行统计学分析,并比较了颈切口和联合入路。

结果

264 例患者因胸骨后甲状腺肿行甲状腺手术。256 例(96.6%)患者选择 Kocher 切口,8 例(3.4%)患者选择辅助切口。需要采用双切口手术与更高的术后并发症发生率相关(p 值<0.01)。颈切口的平均住院时间为 2 天(1-3 天),而联合入路的平均住院时间为 5 天(4-7 天)(p 值=无统计学意义)。

结论

对于胸骨后甲状腺肿,数字解剖的颈切口应是首选技术,几乎所有情况下都能使纵隔部分向外显露。胸骨切开术相关并发症发生率较高,因此仅适用于特定病例。在大容量中心进行管理可能更为合适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db1/8951771/5ef28d91d691/medicina-58-00349-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验