Miskulin Maja, Mujkic Aida, Miskulin Ivan, Makaric Zvjezdana Lovric, Kovacevic Emma, Pintaric Ljiljana, Pavic Zeljko
Faculty of Medicine Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.
Andrija Stampar School of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Mar 5;10(3):399. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030399.
The study aimed to investigate the range of experiences and attitudes of Croatian medical doctors (MDs) related to vaccination and vaccine hesitancy. In January 2021 three asynchronous online focus groups were held using MRQual, a web-based platform, which included 46 MDs from all three levels of the healthcare system in Croatia. NVivo, a qualitative data analysis software package, was used for the thematic analysis of collected data. The participants expressed a high level of support for the Croatian immunization program and vaccines in general. However, some skepticism was expressed regarding new vaccines and the regulatory processes of their approval. A significant number of participants raised concerns over the approval of COVID-19 vaccines, especially given their rapid development. The results also revealed that the process of communication with patients is often based on the very elaborate categorizations of patients based on previous experience, which leads to prioritizing and a communication breakup when dealing with "problematic patients". MDs find themselves in a delicate situation where a fine balance between time-consuming communication with patients and the demands for maintaining satisfying vaccination uptake is needed. The situation arises from a social roles conflict that is embedded in wider social values and expectations, since communication problems do not arise in the doctor's office, and therefore cannot be solved without addressing the social forces that cause trust deficiencies. To achieve better immunization results public health leaders need to better understand the social contexts and constraints of MDs vaccine-related behaviors.
该研究旨在调查克罗地亚医生与疫苗接种及疫苗犹豫相关的经历范围和态度。2021年1月,使用基于网络的平台MRQual举办了三场异步在线焦点小组讨论,参与者包括来自克罗地亚医疗系统三个层级的46名医生。采用定性数据分析软件包NVivo对收集到的数据进行主题分析。参与者总体上对克罗地亚免疫规划和疫苗表示高度支持。然而,对于新疫苗及其审批监管流程存在一些疑虑。相当多的参与者对新冠疫苗的审批表示担忧,尤其是考虑到其快速研发。结果还显示,与患者沟通的过程往往基于根据以往经验对患者进行的非常精细的分类,这导致在处理“问题患者”时进行优先级排序并出现沟通中断。医生们发现自己处于一种微妙的境地,即在与患者进行耗时的沟通和维持令人满意的疫苗接种率的需求之间需要找到微妙的平衡。这种情况源于嵌入更广泛社会价值观和期望中的社会角色冲突,因为沟通问题并非出现在医生办公室,因此如果不解决导致信任缺失的社会力量,就无法解决这些问题。为了取得更好的免疫效果,公共卫生领导人需要更好地理解医生与疫苗相关行为的社会背景和制约因素。