Organic and Biological Analytical Chemistry Group, MolSys Research Unit, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Molecules. 2022 Mar 10;27(6):1806. doi: 10.3390/molecules27061806.
Coffee, one of the most popular beverages in the world, attracts consumers by its rich aroma and the stimulating effect of caffeine. Increasing consumers prefer decaffeinated coffee to regular coffee due to health concerns. There are some main decaffeination methods commonly used by commercial coffee producers for decades. However, a certain amount of the aroma precursors can be removed together with caffeine, which could cause a thin taste of decaffeinated coffee. To understand the difference between regular and decaffeinated coffee from the volatile composition point of view, headspace solid-phase microextraction two-dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS) was employed to examine the headspace volatiles of eight pairs of regular and decaffeinated coffees in this study. Using the key aroma-related volatiles, decaffeinated coffee was significantly separated from regular coffee by principal component analysis (PCA). Using feature-selection tools (univariate analysis: -test and multivariate analysis: partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA)), a group of pyrazines was observed to be significantly different between regular coffee and decaffeinated coffee. Pyrazines were more enriched in the regular coffee, which was due to the reduction of sucrose during the decaffeination process. The reduction of pyrazines led to a lack of nutty, roasted, chocolate, earthy, and musty aroma in the decaffeinated coffee. For the non-targeted analysis, the random forest (RF) classification algorithm was used to select the most important features that could enable a distinct classification between the two coffee types. In total, 20 discriminatory features were identified. The results suggested that pyrazine-derived compounds were a strong marker for the regular coffee group whereas furan-derived compounds were a strong marker for the decaffeinated coffee samples.
咖啡是世界上最受欢迎的饮料之一,其浓郁的香气和咖啡因的刺激作用吸引着消费者。由于健康问题,越来越多的消费者更喜欢脱咖啡因咖啡而不是普通咖啡。几十年来,商业咖啡生产商一直在使用一些主要的脱咖啡因方法。然而,与咖啡因一起可以去除一定量的香气前体,这可能导致脱咖啡因咖啡味道淡薄。为了从挥发性成分的角度了解普通咖啡和脱咖啡因咖啡的区别,本研究采用顶空固相微萃取二维气相色谱飞行时间质谱法(HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS)检测了 8 对普通咖啡和脱咖啡因咖啡的顶空挥发性成分。通过主成分分析(PCA),使用与关键香气相关的挥发性物质,成功将脱咖啡因咖啡与普通咖啡区分开来。使用特征选择工具(单变量分析:t 检验和多变量分析:偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)),观察到一组吡嗪在普通咖啡和脱咖啡因咖啡之间存在显著差异。吡嗪在普通咖啡中更为丰富,这是由于脱咖啡因过程中蔗糖减少所致。吡嗪的减少导致脱咖啡因咖啡缺乏坚果、烘烤、巧克力、泥土和陈腐的香气。对于非靶向分析,使用随机森林(RF)分类算法选择能够在两种咖啡类型之间进行明显分类的最重要特征。总共确定了 20 个有区别的特征。结果表明,吡嗪衍生化合物是普通咖啡组的强烈标记物,而呋喃衍生化合物是脱咖啡因咖啡样品的强烈标记物。