Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, C/ Fuentenueva s/n, E-18071 Granada, Spain.
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, C/ Fuentenueva s/n, E-18071 Granada, Spain.
Food Res Int. 2019 Aug;122:25-39. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.063. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
In recent years, the variety and volume of data acquired by modern analytical instruments in order to conduct a better authentication of food has dramatically increased. Several pattern recognition tools have been developed to deal with the large volume and complexity of available trial data. The most widely used methods are principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), soft independent modelling by class analogy (SIMCA), k-nearest neighbours (kNN), parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC), and multivariate curve resolution-alternating least squares (MCR-ALS). Nevertheless, there are alternative data treatment methods, such as support vector machine (SVM), classification and regression tree (CART) and random forest (RF), that show a great potential and more advantages compared to conventional ones. In this paper, we explain the background of these methods and review and discuss the reported studies in which these three methods have been applied in the area of food quality and authenticity. In addition, we clarify the technical terminology used in this particular area of research.
近年来,为了更好地对食品进行认证,现代分析仪器所获取的数据种类和数量都大幅增加。已经开发了几种模式识别工具来处理可用试验数据的大量和复杂性。应用最广泛的方法是主成分分析(PCA)、偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)、类模拟独立软模式(SIMCA)、k-最近邻(kNN)、平行因子分析(PARAFAC)和多元曲线分辨-交替最小二乘法(MCR-ALS)。然而,还有替代的数据处理方法,如支持向量机(SVM)、分类和回归树(CART)和随机森林(RF),与传统方法相比,这些方法具有很大的潜力和更多的优势。本文介绍了这些方法的背景,并回顾和讨论了这三种方法在食品质量和真实性领域的应用研究。此外,我们还澄清了该研究特定领域中使用的技术术语。