Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Lianhua Road 1120, Futian District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China.
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Lianhua Road 1120, FuTian District, ShenZhen City, GuangDong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 26;23(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05231-x.
All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a novel technique that has gained attention due to its minimally invasive and graft-saving properties. However, studies comparing MRI-based graft maturity between all-inside and standard ACLR are lacking.
This study focused on the functional, knee laxity, and MRI-based graft maturity characteristics of all-inside and standard single-bundle ACLR.
Randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Fifty-four patients were randomly assigned to an all-inside reconstruction group (n = 27) or standard reconstruction group (n = 27). Using the same rehabilitation strategy. The Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Lysholm scores were recorded at postoperative months 3, 6, and 12 to assess functional recovery. MRI was conducted to measure the signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of the intra-articular graft to assess the maturity. A higher SNQ indicates lower graft maturity. Knee laxity was assessed using GNRB arthrometer at the postoperative month 12.
The graft SNQ of the all-inside group was significantly higher than that of the standard group at postoperative month 6 (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in graft SNQ between the two groups at postoperative months 3 and 12 (p > 0.05). Both groups exhibited the highest SNQ in the middle region of the graft, followed by the proximal region, and the distal region. Functional scores improved significantly for both groups and had no statistical difference (p > 0.05). The knee laxity was higher in the all-inside group (p < 0.05) at postoperative month 12. There was no correlation between the functional scores and graft maturity in both groups (p > 0.05).
All-inside and standard single-bundle ACLR show good functional outcomes; however, knee laxity was relatively higher in the all-inside ACLR group than in the standard ACLR group. Moreover, both techniques exhibited poor maturity in the middle graft region and the best in the distal region. Graft maturity with all-inside ACLR is inferior to that with standard ACLR in the early postoperative stages. There is no correlation between knee function and graft maturity.
Clinical trial registration numbers: ChiCTR1800018543 . Date of registration: 09/23/2018.
全内视镜前十字韧带重建(ACLR)是一种新的技术,因其微创和保存移植物的特性而受到关注。然而,目前缺乏关于全内视镜与标准 ACLR 之间基于 MRI 的移植物成熟度比较的研究。
本研究旨在比较全内视镜和标准单束 ACLR 的功能、膝关节松弛度和基于 MRI 的移植物成熟度特征。
随机对照试验(RCT)。
54 名患者被随机分配至全内视镜重建组(n=27)或标准重建组(n=27)。采用相同的康复策略。术后 3、6 和 12 个月记录 Tegner、国际膝关节文献委员会(International Knee Documentation Committee,IKDC)和 Lysholm 评分,以评估功能恢复情况。术后 12 个月行 MRI 检查,测量关节内移植物的信噪比(signal-to-noise ratio,SNR),以评估移植物成熟度。SNR 越高,表明移植物成熟度越低。采用 GNRB 关节测量仪测量术后 12 个月的膝关节松弛度。
术后 6 个月,全内视镜组的移植物 SNR 明显高于标准组(p<0.05)。术后 3 个月和 12 个月,两组移植物 SNR 无统计学差异(p>0.05)。两组移植物 SNQ 均以中部最高,其次是近段,然后是远段。两组功能评分均显著提高,且无统计学差异(p>0.05)。术后 12 个月,全内视镜组的膝关节松弛度较高(p<0.05)。两组的功能评分与移植物成熟度之间均无相关性(p>0.05)。
全内视镜和标准单束 ACLR 均能获得良好的功能结果,但全内视镜 ACLR 组的膝关节松弛度相对较高。此外,两种技术的移植物中部区域成熟度较差,远段区域成熟度较好。在术后早期,全内视镜 ACLR 的移植物成熟度不如标准 ACLR。膝关节功能与移植物成熟度之间无相关性。
临床试验注册编号:ChiCTR1800018543。注册日期:2018 年 9 月 23 日。