• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The generative potential of mess in community-based participatory research with young people who use(d) drugs in Vancouver.在温哥华与曾经吸毒的年轻人开展的基于社区的参与性研究中混乱局面的生成潜力。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Mar 25;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00615-7.
2
Establishing a community-based participatory research partnership among people who use drugs in Ottawa: the PROUD cohort study.在渥太华的吸毒者中建立基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系:骄傲队列研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2014 Oct 13;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-11-26.
3
Community-Engaged Research Ethics Training (CERET): developing accessible and relevant research ethics training for community-based participatory research with people with lived and living experience using illicit drugs and harm reduction workers.社区参与式研究伦理培训(CERET):为使用非法药物和减少伤害工作者的具有生活和生存经验的人开展基于社区的参与式研究开发可及和相关的研究伦理培训。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Jul 6;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00818-6.
4
Community-based participatory research in a heavily researched inner city neighbourhood: Perspectives of people who use drugs on their experiences as peer researchers.基于社区的参与式研究在一个研究密集的内城区:吸毒者作为同伴研究者对其经历的看法。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;176:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.027. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
5
Meaningful engagement of people living with HIV who use drugs: methodology for the design of a Peer Research Associate (PRA) hiring model.感染艾滋病毒的吸毒者的有意义参与:同伴研究助理(PRA)招聘模式设计方法。
Harm Reduct J. 2016 Oct 7;13(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12954-016-0116-z.
6
The ethics of community-based research with people who use drugs: results of a scoping review.针对吸毒者的社区研究伦理:一项范围综述的结果
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Apr 29;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0108-2.
7
Power, Privilege, and Precarity: Attempts to Conduct Ethical Youth Participatory Action Research as Early Career Researchers.权力、特权与脆弱性:作为早期职业研究者进行伦理青年参与式行动研究的尝试。
Health Educ Behav. 2024 Oct;51(5):757-763. doi: 10.1177/10901981241245058. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
8
You say you want a revolution: An empirical study of community-based participatory research with people with developmental disabilities.你说你想要一场革命:一项针对发育障碍人士的社区参与式研究的实证研究。
Disabil Health J. 2016 Apr;9(2):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 3.
9
Critical reflections from a community-based participatory research course.基于社区参与式研究课程的批判性反思
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2013 Sep-Dec;26(3):178-82. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.125996.
10
Ethical Reflections on the Conduct of HIV Research with Community Members: A Case Study.关于与社区成员共同开展 HIV 研究的伦理思考:案例研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2021 Feb-Apr;16(1-2):65-77. doi: 10.1177/1556264620970802. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Building social support into mental health and substance use treatment trajectories: Insights from a longitudinal qualitative and ethnographic study with young people experiencing unstable housing and homelessness.将社会支持融入心理健康和物质使用治疗轨迹:一项针对经历不稳定住房和无家可归的年轻人的纵向定性和人种学研究的见解
Child Youth Serv. 2025 Feb 21. doi: 10.1080/0145935x.2025.2468177.
2
Rural community-based participatory research with families of people who use drugs: key considerations from a multi-provincial research partnership.针对吸毒者家庭的基于农村社区的参与式研究:来自一个多省研究合作项目的关键考量因素
Harm Reduct J. 2025 May 30;22(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01247-3.
3
"The people who depended on us became expendable": Experiences of frontline workers with lived and living expertise of drug use during the COVID-19 pandemic.“那些依赖我们的人变得可有可无”:新冠疫情期间有吸毒生活经历和正在吸毒经历的一线工作者的体验
Harm Reduct J. 2025 May 18;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01221-z.
4
Design and implementation of a Community Expert Group comprised of people with lived expertise of homelessness at an academic health research center: a program description and analysis of challenges.学术健康研究中心内由有过无家可归生活经历的人组成的社区专家小组的设计与实施:项目描述及挑战分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 15;11(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00733-z.
5
Reconceptualizing cannabis use risks in the context of health and social inequities: Insights from a qualitative study with young people in Canada.在健康和社会不平等背景下重新认识大麻使用风险:来自对加拿大年轻人的定性研究的见解
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Apr;138:104474. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104474. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
6
Weaving community-based participatory research and co-design to improve opioid use treatments and services for youth, caregivers, and service providers.将基于社区的参与式研究和共同设计编织在一起,以改善针对青年、照顾者和服务提供者的阿片类药物使用治疗和服务。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0297532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297532. eCollection 2024.
7
Co-production of health and social science research with vulnerable children and young people: A rapid review.弱势儿童和青少年健康与社会科学研究的共同制定:快速综述。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e13991. doi: 10.1111/hex.13991.

本文引用的文献

1
"Something that actually works": Cannabis use among young people in the context of street entrenchment.“真正有效的东西”:街头困境中青年人群的大麻使用情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0236243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236243. eCollection 2020.
2
Opioid agonist therapy trajectories among street entrenched youth in the context of a public health crisis.公共卫生危机背景下街头长期吸毒青年的阿片类激动剂治疗轨迹
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Jun 4;11:100609. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100609. eCollection 2020 Aug.
3
Research 101: A process for developing local guidelines for ethical research in heavily researched communities.研究 101:为深入研究的社区制定伦理研究地方准则的过程。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Jul 1;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0315-5.
4
Intergenerational Trauma: The Relationship Between Residential Schools and the Child Welfare System Among Young People Who Use Drugs in Vancouver, Canada.代际创伤:加拿大温哥华吸毒青年中的寄宿学校与儿童福利系统之间的关系。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Aug;65(2):248-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
5
Conceptualizing Youth Participation in Children's Health Research: Insights from a Youth-Driven Process for Developing a Youth Advisory Council.青少年参与儿童健康研究的概念化:来自青少年主导的青少年咨询委员会发展过程的见解
Children (Basel). 2018 Dec 28;6(1):3. doi: 10.3390/children6010003.
6
Reconciliation and Canada's overdose crisis: responding to the needs of Indigenous Peoples.和解与加拿大的药物过量危机:满足原住民的需求
CMAJ. 2018 Dec 17;190(50):E1466-E1467. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181093.
7
A Seat at the Table: Designing an Activity-Based Community Advisory Committee With People Living With HIV Who Use Drugs.一个席位:设计一个基于活动的社区咨询委员会,成员包括感染艾滋病毒且吸毒的人群。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jun;29(7):1029-1042. doi: 10.1177/1049732318812773. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
8
The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review.弱势儿童和青少年参与式研究中的复杂性和矛盾性:定性系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Oct;215:80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
9
Naloxone and the Inner City Youth Experience (NICYE): a community-based participatory research study examining young people's perceptions of the BC take home naloxone program.纳洛酮与内城青少年体验(NICYE):一项基于社区的参与性研究,考察年轻人对不列颠哥伦比亚省纳洛酮带回家计划的看法。
Harm Reduct J. 2017 Jun 7;14(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0160-3.
10
Community-based participatory research in a heavily researched inner city neighbourhood: Perspectives of people who use drugs on their experiences as peer researchers.基于社区的参与式研究在一个研究密集的内城区:吸毒者作为同伴研究者对其经历的看法。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;176:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.027. Epub 2017 Jan 21.

在温哥华与曾经吸毒的年轻人开展的基于社区的参与性研究中混乱局面的生成潜力。

The generative potential of mess in community-based participatory research with young people who use(d) drugs in Vancouver.

作者信息

Thulien Madison, Anderson Haleigh, Douglas Shane, Dykeman Rainbow, Horne Amanda, Howard Ben, Sedgemore Kali, Charlesworth Reith, Fast Danya

机构信息

British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe St Suite 400, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada.

Youth Health Advisory Council, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2022 Mar 25;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00615-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12954-022-00615-7
PMID:35337350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8956276/
Abstract

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is increasingly standard practice for critical qualitative health research with young people who use(d) drugs in Vancouver, Canada. One aim of CBPR in this context is to redress the essentialization, erasure, and exploitation of people who use(d) drugs in health research. In this paper, we reflect on a partnership that began in 2018 between three university researchers and roughly ten young people (ages 17-28) who have current or past experience with drug use and homelessness in Greater Vancouver. We focus on moments when our guiding principles of shared leadership, safety, and inclusion became fraught in practice, forcing us in some cases to re-imagine these principles, and in others to accept that certain ethical dilemmas in research can never be fully resolved. We argue that this messiness can be traced to the complex and diverse positionalities of each person on our team, including young people. As such, creating space for mess was ethically necessary and empirically valuable for our CBPR project.

摘要

基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)在加拿大温哥华针对曾使用过毒品的年轻人开展的重要定性健康研究中日益成为标准做法。在此背景下,CBPR的一个目标是纠正健康研究中对曾使用过毒品的人的本质化、忽视和剥削。在本文中,我们反思了2018年开始的一段合作关系,合作方是三位大学研究人员以及大约十位在大温哥华地区有过吸毒和无家可归经历的年轻人(年龄在17至28岁之间)。我们关注的是,我们的共同领导、安全和包容等指导原则在实践中变得棘手的时刻,这在某些情况下迫使我们重新构想这些原则,而在另一些情况下则迫使我们接受研究中的某些伦理困境永远无法完全解决。我们认为,这种混乱可以追溯到我们团队中每个人(包括年轻人)复杂多样的立场。因此,为混乱创造空间在伦理上对我们的CBPR项目是必要的,在经验上也是有价值的。