• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Design and implementation of a Community Expert Group comprised of people with lived expertise of homelessness at an academic health research center: a program description and analysis of challenges.学术健康研究中心内由有过无家可归生活经历的人组成的社区专家小组的设计与实施:项目描述及挑战分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 15;11(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00733-z.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Building multi-professional UK partnerships and networks to improve access to palliative care for people experiencing homelessness.建立英国多专业伙伴关系和网络,以改善无家可归者获得姑息治疗的机会。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Mar 12:1-11. doi: 10.3310/JWRG6933.
4
Actualizing community-academic partnerships in research: a case study on rural perinatal peer support.在研究中实现社区与学术机构的合作:一项关于农村围产期同伴支持的案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 18;8(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00407-0.
5
Building trust and inclusion with under-served groups: a public involvement project employing a knowledge mobilisation approach.与服务不足群体建立信任与包容:一个采用知识传播方法的公众参与项目。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Nov 11;10(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00647-2.
6
CENTER-ing Black voices: incorporating lived experience across the research process to advance equity in drug treatment and outcomes.聚焦黑人声音:在整个研究过程中纳入实际生活经验以促进药物治疗及结果的公平性。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Apr 21;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01202-2.
7
Mobilizing the Power of Lived/Living Experiences to Improve Health Outcomes for all.调动生活经历的力量,改善所有人的健康状况。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70212. doi: 10.1111/hex.70212.
8
9
Unlocking data: Decision-maker perspectives on cross-sectoral data sharing and linkage as part of a whole-systems approach to public health policy and practice.解锁数据:决策者对跨部门数据共享与关联的看法,这是公共卫生政策与实践全系统方法的一部分。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Nov 20:1-30. doi: 10.3310/KYTW2173.
10
Lessons learned from a virtual Community-Based Participatory Research project: prioritizing needs of people who have diabetes and experiences of homelessness to co-design a participatory action project.从一个基于社区的虚拟参与式研究项目中吸取的经验教训:优先考虑糖尿病患者和无家可归者的需求,共同设计一个参与式行动项目。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 4;9(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00456-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Community advisory boards as implementation strategies to center partner and patient voice in community health centers.社区咨询委员会作为在社区卫生中心将合作伙伴和患者声音置于中心地位的实施策略。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec 18;9(1):e14. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.679. eCollection 2025.
2
Disparities in healthcare costs of people experiencing homelessness in Toronto, Canada in the post COVID-19 pandemic era: a matched cohort study.后 COVID-19 大流行时代加拿大多伦多无家可归者的医疗保健费用差距:一项匹配队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 24;24(1):1074. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11501-2.
3
Social isolation and loneliness among people living with experience of homelessness: a scoping review.社会隔离和无家可归者经历者的孤独感:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):2515. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19850-7.
4
Disparities in all-cause mortality among people experiencing homelessness in Toronto, Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cohort study.加拿大多伦多无家可归者在 COVID-19 大流行期间全因死亡率的差异:一项队列研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;12:1401662. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401662. eCollection 2024.
5
Bringing Lived Experience to Research on Health and Homelessness: Perspectives of Researchers and Lived Experience Partners.将生活经验带入健康和无家可归问题研究中:研究人员和生活经验伙伴的观点。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Oct;59(7):1235-1242. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01138-6. Epub 2023 May 19.
6
"Just because I have a medical degree does not mean I have the answers": Using CBPR to enhance patient-centered care within a primary care setting.“拥有医学学位并不意味着我知晓所有答案”:运用社区参与式研究提升基层医疗环境中以患者为中心的护理。
Am J Community Psychol. 2023 Sep;72(1-2):217-229. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12677. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
7
Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among People Experiencing Homelessness in Toronto, Canada.加拿大多伦多无家可归者感染 SARS-CoV-2 的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e232774. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2774.
8
Exploring COVID-19 vaccine uptake, confidence and hesitancy among people experiencing homelessness in Toronto, Canada: protocol for the qualitative study.探索加拿大多伦多无家可归者对 COVID-19 疫苗的接种、信心和犹豫:定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 17;12(8):e064225. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064225.
9
The generative potential of mess in community-based participatory research with young people who use(d) drugs in Vancouver.在温哥华与曾经吸毒的年轻人开展的基于社区的参与性研究中混乱局面的生成潜力。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Mar 25;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00615-7.
10
The We Can Quit2 Smoking Cessation Trial: Knowledge Exchange and Dissemination Following a Community-Based Participatory Research Approach.《我们可以戒烟 2:基于社区参与式研究方法的知识交流与传播》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;19(4):2333. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042333.

学术健康研究中心内由有过无家可归生活经历的人组成的社区专家小组的设计与实施:项目描述及挑战分析

Design and implementation of a Community Expert Group comprised of people with lived expertise of homelessness at an academic health research center: a program description and analysis of challenges.

作者信息

Yusuf Ayan A, Hatfield Victoria, Pridham Katherine Francombe, Da Silva George, Adams Rene, Mergarten Daniela, Snooks Veronica, Crichlow Frank, Hwang Stephen W

机构信息

MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 T8, Canada.

Realize Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 15;11(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00733-z.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-025-00733-z
PMID:40375330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12082852/
Abstract

The involvement of communities with a stake in healthcare research is often limited, and attempts to increase their participation and to create shared decision-making partnerships are often hindered by structural barriers. In this paper, we describe the design and implementation of a Community Expert Group comprised of people with lived expertise of homelessness at an academic health research center. We detail the group's model, guiding principles, governance structure, and activities, and discuss institutional challenges encountered over the course of this partnership. We report that the lack of policies and practices in academic research institutions to support long-term collaboration with community experts makes it challenging to define their scope and role, often requiring individual research teams to fill this gap.

摘要

在医疗保健研究中,利益相关社区的参与往往有限,而增加其参与度并建立共同决策伙伴关系的尝试常常受到结构性障碍的阻碍。在本文中,我们描述了一个社区专家组的设计与实施情况,该专家组由学术健康研究中心具有无家可归生活经历的人员组成。我们详细介绍了该小组的模式、指导原则、治理结构和活动,并讨论了在这一伙伴关系过程中遇到的机构性挑战。我们报告称,学术研究机构缺乏支持与社区专家长期合作的政策和做法,这使得界定他们的范围和角色具有挑战性,往往需要个别研究团队来填补这一空白。