Suppr超能文献

跌倒健康素养量表的开发与初步验证

Development and initial validation of the falls health literacy scale.

作者信息

Lim Mei Ling, van Schooten Kimberley S, Radford Kylie A, Delbaere Kim

机构信息

Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Maturitas. 2022 May;159:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(i) To develop the Falls Health Literacy Scale (FHLS), a health literacy tool specific to falls, (ii) to evaluate the FHLS's construct validity towards differentiating individuals with different fall-related health literacy, and (iii) to determine its reliability, construct validity and structure in an older population.

METHODS

The initial FHLS, developed based on Sørensen et al.'s health literacy model, was first administered to 144 participants aged ≥18 years for feedback and scale improvement and preliminary analysis to determine the FHLS's construct validity in identifying individuals with different fall-related health literacy. After scale refinement, the FHLS was validated in 227 community-living people aged ≥65 years.

RESULTS

Adult participants with more fall prevention knowledge scored higher on the initial FHLS than those with less fall prevention knowledge (p≤0.001). The final FHLS includes a 25-item subjective and a 14-item objective scale. Older people with ≥1 fall in the past year reported lower FHLS-subjective scores than those who had no falls (Cohen's [d]=0.29, confidence interval [CI]:0.03-0.56, p=0.03). Older people with lower levels of education had lower FHLS-objective scores than their more educated counterparts (d=0.51, CI:0.38-1.43, p≤0.001). Factor analysis of the FHLS-subjective generated six subscales, with CFA showing adequate model fit (RMSEA=0.077, CFI=0.883 and χ2/df =2.35). FHLS-subjective (25-item) showed good reliability, with Cronbach's alpha=0.93, mean inter-item correlation=0.34 (range -0.03-0.81) and intra-class coefficient =0.86 (95% CI:0.69-0.93).

CONCLUSION

The novel, context-specific FHLS displayed good construct validity and reliability. The FHLS holds promise as a screening tool to differentiate individuals with different degrees of fall-related health literacy, which may help guide fall prevention interventions.

摘要

目的

(i)开发跌倒健康素养量表(FHLS),这是一种专门针对跌倒的健康素养工具;(ii)评估FHLS在区分具有不同跌倒相关健康素养的个体方面的结构效度;(iii)确定其在老年人群中的信度、结构效度和结构。

方法

最初基于索伦森等人的健康素养模型开发的FHLS,首先对144名年龄≥18岁的参与者进行施测,以获取反馈并改进量表,同时进行初步分析以确定FHLS在识别具有不同跌倒相关健康素养个体方面的结构效度。在量表优化后,对227名年龄≥65岁的社区居民进行了FHLS的效度验证。

结果

具有更多跌倒预防知识的成年参与者在初始FHLS上的得分高于跌倒预防知识较少的参与者(p≤0.001)。最终的FHLS包括一个25项的主观量表和一个14项的客观量表。过去一年中发生≥1次跌倒的老年人报告的FHLS主观得分低于未发生跌倒的老年人(科恩d值=0.29,置信区间[CI]:0.03 - 0.56,p = 0.03)。教育程度较低的老年人的FHLS客观得分低于教育程度较高的老年人(d值=0.51,CI:0.38 - 1.43,p≤0.001)。对FHLS主观量表进行因子分析产生了六个子量表,验证性因子分析显示模型拟合良好(RMSEA = 0.077,CFI = 0.883,χ2/df = 2.35)。FHLS主观量表(25项)显示出良好的信度,克朗巴哈α系数=0.93,平均项目间相关性=0.34(范围-0.03 - 0.81),组内相关系数=0.86(95%CI:0.69 - 0.93)。

结论

新颖的、针对特定情境的FHLS显示出良好的结构效度和信度。FHLS有望作为一种筛查工具,用于区分具有不同程度跌倒相关健康素养的个体,这可能有助于指导跌倒预防干预措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验