• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常见视网膜疾病在线患者教育材料的可读性和可解释性。

Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials for Common Retinal Diseases.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California; Byers Eye Institute at Stanford, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 Jul;6(7):641-643. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.oret.2022.03.015
PMID:35338025
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10728491/
Abstract

Patients often utilize the internet to vlearn about retinal diseases. Our results demonstrate that online patient education materials related to common retinal diseases are often written at higher than recommended reading levels and lack accountability.

摘要

患者经常利用互联网了解视网膜疾病。我们的研究结果表明,与常见视网膜疾病相关的在线患者教育材料的书写水平往往高于推荐阅读水平,且缺乏问责制。

相似文献

1
Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials for Common Retinal Diseases.常见视网膜疾病在线患者教育材料的可读性和可解释性。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 Jul;6(7):641-643. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
2
The Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Common Oculoplastics Diagnoses and Treatments.与常见眼部整形诊断和治疗相关的在线患者教育材料的可读性和可问责性
Semin Ophthalmol. 2023 May;38(4):387-393. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2158039. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
3
Assessment of Online Sites Reliability, Accountability, Readability, Accessibility, and Translation for Intravitreal Injections.评估玻璃体腔内注射的在线网站的可靠性、问责制、可读性、可及性和翻译质量。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Dec;4(12):1188-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.病理学相关患者教育文章的在线可读性分析:病理学家教育患者的契机。
Hum Pathol. 2017 Jul;65:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
6
Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration.针对年龄相关性黄斑变性患者设计的在线患者教育材料评估。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x.
7
Assessment of the readability and quality of online patient education materials for the medical treatment of open-angle glaucoma.评估用于开角型青光眼治疗的在线患者教育材料的可读性和质量。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 28;7(1):e000966. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000966. eCollection 2022.
8
Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field.基于互联网的麻醉学领域患者教育材料的可读性评估。
J Clin Anesth. 2015 Aug;27(5):401-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
9
Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to nasal septoplasty.互联网鼻中隔成形术相关患者教育资料的可读性和质量评估。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Mar 17;50(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40463-021-00507-z.
10
Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials.在线泌尿科患者教育材料的可读性评估。
J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):1048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.255. Epub 2012 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Online platform vs. doctors: a comparative exploration of congenital cataract patient education from virtual to reality.在线平台与医生:先天性白内障患者教育从虚拟到现实的比较探索
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jun 3;8:1548385. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1548385. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparing the Accuracy and Readability of Glaucoma-related Question Responses and Educational Materials by Google and ChatGPT.比较谷歌和ChatGPT生成的青光眼相关问题答案及教育材料的准确性和可读性。
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2024 Jul-Sep;18(3):110-116. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1448. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
3
Comparing the Ability of Google and ChatGPT to Accurately Respond to Oculoplastics-Related Patient Questions and Generate Customized Oculoplastics Patient Education Materials.比较谷歌和ChatGPT准确回答眼部整形相关患者问题并生成定制化眼部整形患者教育材料的能力。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 21;18:2647-2655. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S480222. eCollection 2024.
4
Google Trends-Assisted Analysis of the Readability, Accountability, and Accessibility of Online Patient Education Materials for the Treatment of AMD After US FDA Approval of Pegcetacoplan.谷歌趋势辅助分析美国食品药品监督管理局批准培西他科兰后在线患者教育材料在年龄相关性黄斑变性治疗方面的可读性、可问责性和可及性。
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024 Apr 30;8(4):421-427. doi: 10.1177/24741264241250156. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
5
Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment.青光眼诊断与治疗相关在线患者教育材料的可读性及可问责性分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 8;17:779-788. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S401492. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
What Glaucoma Patients Are Reading on the Internet: A Systematic Analysis of Online Glaucoma Content.青光眼患者在网上阅读什么:对网上青光眼内容的系统分析。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Jul-Aug;5(4):447-451. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Online Health Information Seeking Among US Adults: Measuring Progress Toward a Healthy People 2020 Objective.美国成年人的在线健康信息搜索:衡量向 2020 年健康人目标迈进的进展。
Public Health Rep. 2019 Nov/Dec;134(6):617-625. doi: 10.1177/0033354919874074. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
3
Analysis of online patient education materials in pediatric ophthalmology.儿科眼科在线患者教育材料分析
J AAPOS. 2015 Oct;19(5):430-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.07.286.
4
Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.在线眼科患者信息的可读性评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;131(12):1610-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5521.
5
How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review.互联网用户如何查找、评估和使用在线健康信息:一项跨文化综述。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Oct;7(5):497-510. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.497.
6
Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware.评估、控制并确保互联网上医学信息的质量:读者与观者需谨慎——让读者和观者小心。
JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1244-5.