• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谷歌趋势辅助分析美国食品药品监督管理局批准培西他科兰后在线患者教育材料在年龄相关性黄斑变性治疗方面的可读性、可问责性和可及性。

Google Trends-Assisted Analysis of the Readability, Accountability, and Accessibility of Online Patient Education Materials for the Treatment of AMD After US FDA Approval of Pegcetacoplan.

作者信息

Cohen Samuel A, Brant Arthur, Rayess Nadim, Rahimy Ehsan, Pan Carolyn, Fisher Ann Caroline, Pershing Suzann, Do Diana

机构信息

Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Retina Associates of Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024 Apr 30;8(4):421-427. doi: 10.1177/24741264241250156. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.1177/24741264241250156
PMID:39148568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11323505/
Abstract

To evaluate the readability, accountability, accessibility, and source of online patient education materials for treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to quantify public interest in Syfovre and geographic atrophy after US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Websites were classified into 4 categories by information source. Readability was assessed using 5 validated readability indices. Accountability was assessed using 4 benchmarks of the (). Accessibility was evaluated using 3 established criteria. The Google Trends tool was used to evaluate temporal trends in public interest in "Syfovre" and "geographic atrophy" in the months after FDA approval. Of 100 websites analyzed, 22% were written below the recommended sixth-grade reading level. The mean (±SD) grade level of analyzed articles was 9.76 ± 3.35. Websites averaged 1.40 ± 1.39 (of 4) accountability metrics. The majority of articles (67%) were from private practice/independent organizations. A significant increase in the public interest in the terms "Syfovre" and "geographic atrophy" after FDA approval was found with the Google Trends tool ( < .001). Patient education materials related to AMD treatment are often written at inappropriate reading levels and lack established accountability and accessibility metrics. Articles from national organizations ranked highest on accessibility metrics but were less visible on a Google search, suggesting the need for visibility-enhancing measures. Patient education materials related to the term "Syfovre" had the highest average reading level and low accountability, suggesting the need to modify resources to best address the needs of an increasingly curious public.

摘要

评估用于治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的在线患者教育材料的可读性、可问责性、可及性及来源,并在美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准后量化公众对Syfovre和地图样萎缩的兴趣。网站根据信息来源分为4类。使用5种经过验证的可读性指数评估可读性。使用()的4个基准评估可问责性。使用3项既定标准评估可及性。谷歌趋势工具用于评估FDA批准后数月内公众对“Syfovre”和“地图样萎缩”兴趣的时间趋势。在分析的100个网站中,22%的网站写作水平低于推荐的六年级阅读水平。分析文章的平均(±标准差)年级水平为9.76±3.35。网站的可问责性指标平均为1.40±1.39(满分4分)。大多数文章(67%)来自私人执业/独立组织。使用谷歌趋势工具发现,FDA批准后,公众对“Syfovre”和“地图样萎缩”这两个术语的兴趣显著增加(P<0.001)。与AMD治疗相关的患者教育材料通常写作水平不合适,缺乏既定的可问责性和可及性指标。来自国家组织的文章在可及性指标上排名最高,但在谷歌搜索中不太显眼,这表明需要采取提高可见性的措施。与“Syfovre”一词相关的患者教育材料平均阅读水平最高,但可问责性较低,这表明需要修改资源以最好地满足日益好奇的公众的需求。

相似文献

1
Google Trends-Assisted Analysis of the Readability, Accountability, and Accessibility of Online Patient Education Materials for the Treatment of AMD After US FDA Approval of Pegcetacoplan.谷歌趋势辅助分析美国食品药品监督管理局批准培西他科兰后在线患者教育材料在年龄相关性黄斑变性治疗方面的可读性、可问责性和可及性。
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024 Apr 30;8(4):421-427. doi: 10.1177/24741264241250156. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
2
Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment.青光眼诊断与治疗相关在线患者教育材料的可读性及可问责性分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 8;17:779-788. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S401492. eCollection 2023.
3
The Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Common Oculoplastics Diagnoses and Treatments.与常见眼部整形诊断和治疗相关的在线患者教育材料的可读性和可问责性
Semin Ophthalmol. 2023 May;38(4):387-393. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2158039. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
4
Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.青光眼在线患者教育材料的可读性和适宜性。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Sep-Oct;5(5):525-530. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
5
Quality, Readability, and Accessibility of Online Content From a Google Search of "Macular Degeneration": Critical Analysis.谷歌搜索“黄斑变性”在线内容的质量、可读性和可及性:批判性分析
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2022 Jun 9;6(6):437-442. doi: 10.1177/24741264221094683. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
6
Assessing the Readability, Quality, and Visual Accessibility of Patient Education Websites for Laser Refractive Surgery.评估激光屈光手术患者教育网站的可读性、质量和视觉可及性。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2025 May 4:1-7. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2025.2500014.
7
Assessment of Online Sites Reliability, Accountability, Readability, Accessibility, and Translation for Intravitreal Injections.评估玻璃体腔内注射的在线网站的可靠性、问责制、可读性、可及性和翻译质量。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Dec;4(12):1188-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
8
Google Search Trends to Assess Public Interest and Concern About Pegcetacoplan for the Treatment of Geographic Atrophy.使用谷歌搜索趋势评估公众对培格他赛普用于治疗地图样萎缩的兴趣和关注。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2024 Aug;55(8):452-460. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20240409-04. Epub 2024 May 1.
9
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
10
Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration.针对年龄相关性黄斑变性患者设计的在线患者教育材料评估。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the Accuracy and Readability of Glaucoma-related Question Responses and Educational Materials by Google and ChatGPT.比较谷歌和ChatGPT生成的青光眼相关问题答案及教育材料的准确性和可读性。
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2024 Jul-Sep;18(3):110-116. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1448. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality, Readability, and Accessibility of Online Content From a Google Search of "Macular Degeneration": Critical Analysis.谷歌搜索“黄斑变性”在线内容的质量、可读性和可及性:批判性分析
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2022 Jun 9;6(6):437-442. doi: 10.1177/24741264221094683. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
2
Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment.青光眼诊断与治疗相关在线患者教育材料的可读性及可问责性分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 8;17:779-788. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S401492. eCollection 2023.
3
The Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Common Oculoplastics Diagnoses and Treatments.与常见眼部整形诊断和治疗相关的在线患者教育材料的可读性和可问责性
Semin Ophthalmol. 2023 May;38(4):387-393. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2158039. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
4
Disparities in Vision Health and Eye Care.视力健康和眼保健的差异。
Ophthalmology. 2022 Oct;129(10):e89-e113. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.07.010. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
5
Health literacy and ophthalmology: A scoping review.健康素养与眼科学:范围综述。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan-Feb;68(1):78-103. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
6
Google Searches for Thyroid Eye Disease After Regulatory Approval of Teprotumumab.监管批准特普妥单抗后对甲状腺眼病的谷歌搜索。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 1;140(6):639-642. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.1000.
7
Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials for Common Retinal Diseases.常见视网膜疾病在线患者教育材料的可读性和可解释性。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 Jul;6(7):641-643. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
8
Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.青光眼在线患者教育材料的可读性和适宜性。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Sep-Oct;5(5):525-530. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
9
Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.青光眼在线患者教育资料的可读性。
J Glaucoma. 2022 Jun 1;31(6):438-442. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002012. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
10
Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review.老年人使用电子健康的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):1556. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11623-w.