文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

互联网用户如何查找、评估和使用在线健康信息:一项跨文化综述。

How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review.

作者信息

Morahan-Martin Janet M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bryant University, Smithfield, Rhode Island 02917-1284, USA.

出版信息

Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Oct;7(5):497-510. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.497.


DOI:10.1089/cpb.2004.7.497
PMID:15667044
Abstract

The Internet has become a favored source to find health information. Worldwide, about 4.5% of all Internet searches are for health-related information. However, research has found that the quality of online health information is mixed, which raises serious concerns about the impact of this information. This paper reviews relevant research to understand how health information on the Internet is retrieved, evaluated, and used. Most users of online health information are looking for information about specific health conditions because they or someone they know was diagnosed with a medical condition. They typically use general search engines to find online health information and enter short phrases, often misspelled. They seldom go beyond the first page of a search. Both their search and evaluation skills are limited although they are concerned about the quality of online health information. They avoid sites with overt commercialism, but often do not pay attention to indicators of credibility. Online health information is used to fill an information void which can enhance coping and self efficacy, affects health-related decisions and behavior of users and their friends and family, and is often discussed with health care providers. There are cross-cultural differences in the types of sites used as well as how online information is used. Based on the research reviewed in this paper, three major recommendations are suggested. Professionals should recommend sites. Professionals should promote more effective search and evaluation techniques. Professionals should be involved in developing and promoting uniform standards for health and mental health sites.

摘要

互联网已成为获取健康信息的热门来源。在全球范围内,所有互联网搜索中约有4.5%是关于健康相关信息的。然而,研究发现在线健康信息的质量参差不齐,这引发了人们对这些信息影响的严重担忧。本文回顾了相关研究,以了解互联网上的健康信息是如何被检索、评估和使用的。大多数在线健康信息用户在寻找有关特定健康状况的信息,因为他们自己或他们认识的人被诊断出患有某种疾病。他们通常使用通用搜索引擎来查找在线健康信息,并输入简短的短语,这些短语常常拼写错误。他们很少浏览搜索结果的第一页之外的内容。尽管他们关心在线健康信息的质量,但他们的搜索和评估技能都很有限。他们会避开带有明显商业气息的网站,但往往不关注可信度指标。在线健康信息被用来填补信息空白,这可以增强应对能力和自我效能感,影响用户及其朋友和家人与健康相关的决策和行为,并且经常会与医疗保健提供者进行讨论。在使用的网站类型以及在线信息的使用方式上存在跨文化差异。基于本文所回顾的研究,提出了三项主要建议。专业人员应推荐网站。专业人员应推广更有效的搜索和评估技术。专业人员应参与制定和推广针对健康和心理健康网站的统一标准。

相似文献

[1]
How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review.

Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004-10

[2]
Searching the Internet for drug-related web sites: analysis of online available information on ecstasy (MDMA).

Am J Addict. 2007

[3]
Evaluation of health professionals in the use of internet information retrieval systems in health: a literature review.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013

[4]
Language preferences on websites and in Google searches for human health and food information.

J Med Internet Res. 2007-6-28

[5]
What are patients seeking when they turn to the Internet? Qualitative content analysis of questions asked by visitors to an orthopaedics Web site.

J Med Internet Res. 2003-10-10

[6]
Setting the public agenda for online health search: a white paper and action agenda.

J Med Internet Res. 2004-6-8

[7]
Information for surgical patients: implications of the World Wide Web.

Eur J Surg. 2001-10

[8]
Positive attitudes and failed queries: an exploration of the conundrums of consumer health information retrieval.

Int J Med Inform. 2004-2

[9]
Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art.

Health Educ Res. 2001-12

[10]
Googling Self-injury: the state of health information obtained through online searches for self-injury.

JAMA Pediatr. 2014-5

引用本文的文献

[1]
Quality assessment of spinal cord injury-related health information on short-form video platforms: Cross-sectional content analysis of TikTok, Kwai, and BiliBili.

Digit Health. 2025-9-2

[2]
Using Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT to Access Medical Information About Chemical Eye Injuries: Comparative Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2025-8-13

[3]
Quality and reliability of YouTube videos on fascial sling surgery.

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025-8-8

[4]
Quality of cataract-related videos on TikTok and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study.

Digit Health. 2025-7-29

[5]
Managing risks and harms associated with the use of anabolic steroids: a qualitative study.

Harm Reduct J. 2025-7-28

[6]
The Quality and Reliability of Online Videos as an Information Source of Public Health Education for Stroke Prevention in Mainland China: Electronic Media-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

JMIR Infodemiology. 2025-7-21

[7]
Assessing the quality of Japanese online breast cancer treatment information using large language models: a comparison of ChatGPT, Claude, and expert evaluations.

Breast Cancer. 2025-5-21

[8]
Online Health Information-Seeking Behaviors Among the Chongqing Population: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2025-5-5

[9]
Appropriate trust in online health information is associated with information platform, commercial status, and misinformation in patients with high cardiovascular risk.

Digit Health. 2025-4-29

[10]
Large Language Models: Pioneering New Educational Frontiers in Childhood Myopia.

Ophthalmol Ther. 2025-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索