• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大流行期间维持微创外科服务。

Maintaining a minimally invasive surgical service during a pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery Great, Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.

NIHR Biomedical Research Center, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 May;38(5):769-775. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05107-0. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00383-022-05107-0
PMID:35338381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8956142/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was questioned in the COVID-19 pandemic due to concern regarding disease spread. We continued MIS during the pandemic with appropriate protective measures. This study aims to assess the safety of MIS compared to Open Surgery (OS) in this setting.

METHODS

Operations performed during 2020 lockdown were compared with operations from the same time-period in 2019 and 2021. Outcomes reviewed included all complications, respiratory complications, length of stay (LOS) and operating surgeon COVID-19 infections (OSI).

RESULTS

In 2020, MIS comprised 52% of procedures. 29% of MIS 2020 had complications (2019: 24%, 2021: 15%; p = 0.08) vs 47% in OS 2020 (p = 0.04 vs MIS). 8.5% of MIS 2020 had respiratory complications (2019: 7.7%, 2021: 6.9%; p = 0.9) vs 10.5% in OS 2020 (p = 0.8 vs MIS). Median LOS[IQR] for MIS 2020 was 2.5[6] days vs 5[23] days in OS 2020 (p = 0.06). In 2020, 2 patients (1.2%) were COVID-19 positive (MIS: 1, OS: 1) and there were no OSI.

CONCLUSION

Despite extensive use of MIS during the pandemic, there was no associated increase in respiratory or other complications, and no OSI. Our study suggests that, with appropriate protective measures, MIS can be performed safely despite high levels of COVID-19 in the population.

摘要

目的

由于担心疾病传播,微创外科 (MIS) 在 COVID-19 大流行期间的安全性受到质疑。我们在大流行期间采取了适当的保护措施继续进行 MIS。本研究旨在评估在此背景下与开放手术 (OS) 相比 MIS 的安全性。

方法

比较 2020 年封锁期间进行的手术与 2019 年和 2021 年同期的手术。回顾的结果包括所有并发症、呼吸系统并发症、住院时间 (LOS) 和手术医生 COVID-19 感染 (OSI)。

结果

2020 年,MIS 占手术的 52%。2020 年 MIS 中有 29%(2019 年:24%,2021 年:15%;p=0.08)出现并发症,而 2020 年 OS 中则有 47%(p=0.04 与 MIS 相比)。2020 年 MIS 中有 8.5%(2019 年:7.7%,2021 年:6.9%;p=0.9)出现呼吸系统并发症,而 2020 年 OS 中则有 10.5%(p=0.8 与 MIS 相比)。2020 年 MIS 的中位 LOS[IQR]为 2.5[6]天,而 OS 为 5[23]天(p=0.06)。2020 年有 2 名患者(1.2%)COVID-19 阳性(MIS:1 例,OS:1 例),无 OSI。

结论

尽管在大流行期间广泛使用 MIS,但呼吸系统或其他并发症没有增加,也没有 OSI。我们的研究表明,在人群中 COVID-19 水平较高的情况下,采取适当的保护措施,MIS 可以安全进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb81/8983522/7365ee725091/383_2022_5107_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb81/8983522/289140db711b/383_2022_5107_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb81/8983522/7886d3736070/383_2022_5107_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb81/8983522/6bb5423329e9/383_2022_5107_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb81/8983522/7365ee725091/383_2022_5107_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb81/8983522/289140db711b/383_2022_5107_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb81/8983522/7886d3736070/383_2022_5107_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb81/8983522/6bb5423329e9/383_2022_5107_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb81/8983522/7365ee725091/383_2022_5107_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Maintaining a minimally invasive surgical service during a pandemic.在大流行期间维持微创外科服务。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 May;38(5):769-775. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05107-0. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
2
Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.与开放性手术相比,微创结直肠切除术与降低吻合口漏和其他主要围手术期并发症的风险以及降低医院资源利用相关:一项基于人群的回顾性比较有效性研究和手术方法趋势。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):610-621. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06805-y. Epub 2019 May 14.
3
The MIS-COVID-AGICT Study: Trend of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer Treatment During the First Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy. Subgroup Analysis from the COVID-AGICT Study: COVID-19 and Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgical Treatment.MIS-COVID-AGICT 研究:意大利 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间胃肠道癌症微创治疗趋势。COVID-AGICT 研究的亚组分析:COVID-19 与晚期胃肠道癌症手术治疗。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Jun;33(6):579-585. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0058. Epub 2023 May 2.
4
Streamlining brain tumor surgery care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case-control study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间简化脑肿瘤手术护理:一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0254958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254958. eCollection 2021.
5
Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.选择性腰椎椎间融合术后使用微创融合技术是否与更好的疗效相关?一项全国性前瞻性患者报告结局登记研究的分析。
Spine J. 2017 Jul;17(7):922-932. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
Influence of surgeon specialty and volume on the utilization of minimally invasive surgery and outcomes for colorectal cancer: a retrospective review.外科医生专业和手术量对结直肠癌微创治疗的应用和结果的影响:回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5480-5488. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08039-9. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery for Extraforaminal Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.椎间孔外型腰椎间盘突出症的开放手术与微创手术:系统评价与荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;108:924-938.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
8
Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.微创与开放后路腰椎融合术的围手术期结局及不良事件:荟萃分析与系统评价
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):416-27. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE14973. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
9
A nationwide survey on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on minimal invasive surgery in urology practice.一项关于 COVID-19 大流行对泌尿外科微创外科实践影响的全国性调查。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;75(8):e14309. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14309. Epub 2021 May 20.
10
Minimally invasive lumbar decompression-the surgical learning curve.微创腰椎减压术——手术学习曲线
Spine J. 2016 Aug;16(8):909-16. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.455. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to improve patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间改善患者安全的干预措施:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jun 30;14(2):e003076. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003076.

本文引用的文献

1
Management and early outcomes of children with appendicitis in the UK and Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of surgeons and observational study.英国和爱尔兰新冠疫情期间儿童阑尾炎的管理与早期治疗结果:外科医生调查及观察性研究
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020 Oct 22;4(1):e000831. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000831. eCollection 2020.
2
The quantitative impact of COVID-19 on surgical training in the United Kingdom.新冠疫情对英国外科培训的量化影响。
BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab051.
3
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on central-line-associated bloodstream infections during the early months of 2020, National Healthcare Safety Network.
2020 年头几个月 COVID-19 大流行对中心静脉导管相关血流感染的影响,国家医疗保健安全网络。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;43(6):790-793. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.108. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
4
Laparoscopic vs open surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: what are the risks?在 COVID-19 大流行期间,腹腔镜手术与开放手术相比:风险有哪些?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 May;103(5):354-359. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7067. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI): The urgent need to refocus on hardwiring prevention efforts.2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行、中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)和导尿管相关尿路感染(CAUTI):迫切需要重新聚焦于将预防措施落实到位。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;43(1):26-31. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.70. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
Laparoscopic Surgery and the debate on its safety during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of recommendations.腹腔镜手术与 COVID-19 大流行期间安全性的争论:建议的系统评价。
Surgeon. 2021 Apr;19(2):e29-e39. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
7
Laparoscopic surgery and coronavirus disease: What do we know now?腹腔镜手术与冠状病毒病:目前我们了解多少?
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020;75:e2083. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2083. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
8
Initial advice to avoid Laparoscopic Surgery due to fear of COVID-19 virus transmission: Where was the evidence?由于担心新冠病毒传播而最初建议避免进行腹腔镜手术:证据在哪里?
Br J Surg. 2020 Sep;107(10):e418. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11860. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
9
COVID-19 infection in pregnant women, preterm delivery, birth weight, and vertical transmission: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 感染与孕妇、早产、出生体重和垂直传播:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cad Saude Publica. 2020;36(7):e00087320. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00087320. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
10
Management of COVID-19-Positive Pediatric Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures: Systematic Review and Recommendations of the Board of European Society of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgeons.接受微创手术的新冠病毒检测呈阳性的儿科患者的管理:欧洲小儿内镜外科学会理事会的系统评价与建议
Front Pediatr. 2020 May 7;8:259. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00259. eCollection 2020.