Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital (EM Bucholz), Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School (EM Bucholz and SL Toomey), Boston, Mass.
Harvard Medical School (EM Bucholz and SL Toomey), Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital (SL Toomey), Boston, Mass.
Acad Pediatr. 2022 Apr;22(3S):S108-S114. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.09.023.
Outcome and utilization quality measures are adjusted for patient case-mix including demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions to allow for comparisons between hospitals and health plans. However, controversy exists around whether and how to adjust for social risk factors.
To assess an approach to incorporating social risk variables into a pediatric measure of utilization from the Pediatric Quality Measures Program (PQMP).
We used data from California Medicaid claims (2015-16) and Massachusetts All Payer Claims Database (2014-2015) to calculate health plan performance using measure specifications from the Pediatric Asthma Emergency Department Use measure. Health plan performance categories were assessed using mixed effect negative binomial models with and without adjustment for social risk factors, with both models adjusting for age, gender and chronic condition category. Mixed effects linear models were then used to compare patient social risk for health plans that changed performance categories to patient social risk for health plans that did not.
Of 133 health plans, serving 404,649 pediatric patients with asthma, 7% to 13% changed performance categories after social risk adjustment. Health plans that moved to higher performance categories cared for lower socioeconomic status (SES) patients whereas those that moved to lower performance categories cared for higher SES patients.
Adjustment for social risk factors changed performance rankings on the PQMP Pediatric Asthma Emergency Department Use measure for a substantial number of health plans. Some health plans caring for higher risk patients performed more poorly when social risk factors were not included in risk adjustment models. In light of this, social risk factors are incorporated into the National Quality Forum-endorsed measure; whether to incorporate social risk factors into pediatric quality measures will differ depending on the use case.
结果和利用质量指标根据患者病例组合进行调整,包括人口统计学特征和合并症,以允许在医院和医疗计划之间进行比较。然而,关于是否以及如何调整社会风险因素存在争议。
评估一种将社会风险变量纳入儿科利用测量的方法,该方法来自儿科质量测量计划(PQMP)。
我们使用了来自加利福尼亚州医疗补助索赔(2015-16 年)和马萨诸塞州所有支付者索赔数据库(2014-2015 年)的数据,根据儿科哮喘急诊利用测量的测量规范计算了医疗计划的绩效。使用混合效应负二项式模型,分别在调整和不调整社会风险因素的情况下评估了医疗计划的绩效类别,两个模型都调整了年龄、性别和慢性疾病类别。然后使用混合效应线性模型比较了绩效类别发生变化的医疗计划的患者社会风险与绩效类别未发生变化的医疗计划的患者社会风险。
在 133 个医疗计划中,有 7%至 13%的医疗计划在调整社会风险因素后改变了绩效类别,为 404649 名患有哮喘的儿科患者提供服务。社会风险调整后,绩效类别上升的医疗计划照顾的是社会经济地位(SES)较低的患者,而绩效类别下降的医疗计划照顾的是 SES 较高的患者。
在相当多的医疗计划中,对社会风险因素的调整改变了 PQMP 儿科哮喘急诊利用测量的绩效排名。当社会风险因素不包括在风险调整模型中时,一些照顾高风险患者的医疗计划表现较差。鉴于此,社会风险因素被纳入了国家质量论坛认可的测量方法中;是否将社会风险因素纳入儿科质量测量方法将因使用情况而异。