Suppr超能文献

双腔管气管插管不同喉镜显露技术对上切牙牙周受力的影响:一项盲法研究

Dental Strain on Maxillary Incisors During Tracheal Intubation With Double-Lumen Tubes and Different Laryngoscopy Techniques - A Blinded Mannequin Study.

机构信息

University Witten/Herdecke, Medical Centre Cologne-Merheim, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cologne, Germany.

BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil (Ruhr-University Bochum), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Aug;36(8 Pt B):3021-3027. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.02.017. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To quantify dental forces during double-lumen tube intubations with different laryngoscopy techniques.

DESIGN

Experimental biomechanical mannequin study.

SETTING

Two German university hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred four anesthesiologists with varying levels of experience.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants performed a sequence of intubations on a mannequin equipped with hidden forces sensors in the maxillary incisors. Different laryngoscopy techniques were evaluated under normal and difficult airway conditions. Direct laryngoscopy was compared with different videolaryngoscopy techniques: the C-MAC with a Macintosh blade, the GlideScope, and the KingVision with hyperangulated blades.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 624 intubations were evaluated. In normal airway conditions, the median (interquartile range [range]) peak forces were significantly lower when the GlideScope (15.7 (11.3-22.0 [2.1-110.5]) N) was used compared with direct laryngoscopy (21.0 (14.1-28.5[4.7-168.6]) N) (p = 0.007). In difficult airways, resulting forces were reduced using hyperangulated videolaryngoscopes (GlideScope: -13.7 N [p < 0.001]; KingVision: -11.9 N [p < 0.001]) compared with direct laryngoscopy, respectively. The time to intubation was prolonged with the use of the KingVision (25.5 (17.1-41.9[9.2-275.0])s [p < 0.001]) in comparison to direct laryngoscopy (20.8 (15.9-27.4[8.7-198.6]) s). The C-MAC demonstrated the shortest time to intubation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although hyperangulated videolaryngoscopes improve dental strain, clinicians also should consider the time to intubation, which is shortest with nonhyperangulated videoblades, when choosing a laryngoscopy technique on an individual patient basis.

摘要

目的

量化不同喉镜技术下双腔管插管时的牙齿受力。

设计

实验生物力学模拟研究。

设置

两家德国大学医院。

参与者

104 名不同经验水平的麻醉师。

干预措施

参与者在配备有隐藏力传感器的上颌切牙的模拟人上进行一系列插管。在正常和困难气道条件下评估不同的喉镜技术。直接喉镜与不同的视频喉镜技术进行比较:C-MAC 配 Macintosh 叶片、GlideScope 和 KingVision 配超角度叶片。

测量和主要结果

共评估了 624 次插管。在正常气道条件下,与直接喉镜(21.0(14.1-28.5[4.7-168.6]N)相比,GlideScope(15.7(11.3-22.0[2.1-110.5]N)使用时的峰值力明显更低(p=0.007)。在困难气道中,与直接喉镜相比,使用超角度视频喉镜可降低插管时的力(GlideScope:-13.7 N [p<0.001];KingVision:-11.9 N [p<0.001])。与直接喉镜相比,使用 KingVision 时插管时间延长(25.5(17.1-41.9[9.2-275.0]s [p<0.001]),而直接喉镜为 20.8(15.9-27.4[8.7-198.6]s)。C-MAC 显示插管时间最短。

结论

尽管超角度视频喉镜可改善牙齿应变,但在个体化患者基础上选择喉镜技术时,临床医生还应考虑插管时间,非超角度叶片的插管时间最短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验