University Witten/Herdecke, Medical Centre Cologne-Merheim, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil (Ruhr-University Bochum), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Bochum, Germany.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Aug;36(8 Pt B):3021-3027. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.02.017. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
To quantify dental forces during double-lumen tube intubations with different laryngoscopy techniques.
Experimental biomechanical mannequin study.
Two German university hospitals.
One hundred four anesthesiologists with varying levels of experience.
Participants performed a sequence of intubations on a mannequin equipped with hidden forces sensors in the maxillary incisors. Different laryngoscopy techniques were evaluated under normal and difficult airway conditions. Direct laryngoscopy was compared with different videolaryngoscopy techniques: the C-MAC with a Macintosh blade, the GlideScope, and the KingVision with hyperangulated blades.
A total of 624 intubations were evaluated. In normal airway conditions, the median (interquartile range [range]) peak forces were significantly lower when the GlideScope (15.7 (11.3-22.0 [2.1-110.5]) N) was used compared with direct laryngoscopy (21.0 (14.1-28.5[4.7-168.6]) N) (p = 0.007). In difficult airways, resulting forces were reduced using hyperangulated videolaryngoscopes (GlideScope: -13.7 N [p < 0.001]; KingVision: -11.9 N [p < 0.001]) compared with direct laryngoscopy, respectively. The time to intubation was prolonged with the use of the KingVision (25.5 (17.1-41.9[9.2-275.0])s [p < 0.001]) in comparison to direct laryngoscopy (20.8 (15.9-27.4[8.7-198.6]) s). The C-MAC demonstrated the shortest time to intubation.
Although hyperangulated videolaryngoscopes improve dental strain, clinicians also should consider the time to intubation, which is shortest with nonhyperangulated videoblades, when choosing a laryngoscopy technique on an individual patient basis.
量化不同喉镜技术下双腔管插管时的牙齿受力。
实验生物力学模拟研究。
两家德国大学医院。
104 名不同经验水平的麻醉师。
参与者在配备有隐藏力传感器的上颌切牙的模拟人上进行一系列插管。在正常和困难气道条件下评估不同的喉镜技术。直接喉镜与不同的视频喉镜技术进行比较:C-MAC 配 Macintosh 叶片、GlideScope 和 KingVision 配超角度叶片。
共评估了 624 次插管。在正常气道条件下,与直接喉镜(21.0(14.1-28.5[4.7-168.6]N)相比,GlideScope(15.7(11.3-22.0[2.1-110.5]N)使用时的峰值力明显更低(p=0.007)。在困难气道中,与直接喉镜相比,使用超角度视频喉镜可降低插管时的力(GlideScope:-13.7 N [p<0.001];KingVision:-11.9 N [p<0.001])。与直接喉镜相比,使用 KingVision 时插管时间延长(25.5(17.1-41.9[9.2-275.0]s [p<0.001]),而直接喉镜为 20.8(15.9-27.4[8.7-198.6]s)。C-MAC 显示插管时间最短。
尽管超角度视频喉镜可改善牙齿应变,但在个体化患者基础上选择喉镜技术时,临床医生还应考虑插管时间,非超角度叶片的插管时间最短。