Utilization of Thromboelastography with Platelet Mapping to Predict Infection and Poor Wound Healing in Postoperative Vascular Patients.

BACKGROUND

Postoperative infection and wound dehiscence rates are higher than expected in peripheral artery disease and contribute significantly to limb loss and mortality. Microvascular pathology characterized by microthrombi and increased platelet aggregation have been cited as contributing factors to poor wound healing and infection. The emergence of viscoelastic assays, such as thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM), have been utilized to identify prothrombotic states and may provide insight into a patient's microvascular coagulation profile. This prospective, observational study aimed to determine if TEG-PM could predict poor wound healing or infection following lower extremity revascularization.

METHODS

All patients undergoing revascularization between December 2020 and January 2022 were prospectively included and followed for wound complications or non-surgical site infections of the index limb. TEG-PM metrics at the first postoperative follow-up in the nonevent group was compared to the TEG-PM sample preceding the diagnosis of infection/dehiscence in the event group. Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression was used to model the predictive value of viscoelastic parameters. Cut-point analysis to determine high-risk groups was determined by performing receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 102 patients, 18.6% experienced infection/dehiscence. The TEG-PM sample analyzed in the event group was, on average, 19.5 days prior to the diagnosis of an event. The event group had significantly higher maximum clot amplitude (MA) (47.3 mm ± 16.0 vs. 30.6 mm ± 15.3, P < 0.01), higher platelet aggregation (71.3% ± 27.7 vs. 31.2% ± 24.0, P < 0.01), and lower platelet inhibition (28.7% ± 27.7 vs. 68.7% ± 24.1, P < 0.01). Cox PH analysis identified platelet aggregation as an independent and consistent predictor of infection (hazard ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.06, P < 0.01). An optimal cut-point of > 33.2 mm MA, > 46.6% platelet aggregation, or < 55.8% platelet inhibition identifies those with infection/dehiscence with 79.0-89.5% sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

These are the first data to provide a quantitative link between prothrombotic viscoelastic coagulation profiles with the development of infection/dehiscence. Based on the cut-points of > 33.2 mm MA, > 46.6% platelet aggregation, or < 55.8% platelet inhibition, we recommend consideration of an enhanced antimicrobial or antithrombotic approach for these high risk groups.