Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Vet J. 2022 Sep;287:105882. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2022.105882. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
Most dogs with immune mediated haemolytic anaemia (IMHA) are hypercoagulable, as measured by thromboelastography (TEG). Thromboelastography-platelet mapping (TEG-PM) has been used to assess platelet function in human patients treated with aspirin or clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to compare platelet thromboxane A-receptor inhibition (TXARI) and platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-receptor inhibition (ADP-RI) as measured by TEG-PM in dogs with primary IMHA receiving aspirin or clopidogrel to determine if TEG-PM might be useful to monitor treatment. Eighteen client-owned dogs with IMHA were enroled in a prospective double blinded study. Dogs were randomised to receive aspirin or clopidogrel in addition to standard therapy. Thromboelastography was measured before, and 1 and 4 days after commencing treatment. Thromboelastography-PM was performed on days 1 and 4. Non-responders were defined as < 50 % platelet thromboxane A-receptor inhibition (TXARI) in the aspirin group and < 50 % platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-receptor inhibition (ADP-RI) in the clopidogrel group, on day 4. Mean platelet TXA-RI and platelet ADP-RI were not significantly different between groups at any timepoint (P > 0.05). The overall mean percentage inhibition of TXA-receptor was 25 % (aspirin 33 %, clopidogrel 15 %), and of ADP-receptor was 82 % (aspirin 83 %, clopidogrel 80 %). On day 4, 6/9 dogs (66 %) in the aspirin group and 2/8 dogs (25 %) in the clopidogrel group were non-responders (P = 0.086). Two dogs defined as responders based on TEG-PM developed thromboembolism. Overall, there was no significant difference in efficacy between aspirin and clopidogrel based on measurement of receptor inhibition using TEG-PM (P > 0.05), and routine TEG was not reliable for monitoring treatment response in dogs with IMHA. In some dogs, there was a discrepancy between TEG-PM results and clinical response. Further investigation of TEG-PM use in dogs, including its usefulness to monitor treatment response and adjust treatment in individual dogs and any effect of anaemia, is warranted.
大多数免疫介导性溶血性贫血 (IMHA) 的狗,如通过血栓弹性描记法 (TEG) 测量的那样,处于高凝状态。血栓弹性描记血小板映射 (TEG-PM) 已被用于评估接受阿司匹林或氯吡格雷治疗的人类患者的血小板功能。本研究的目的是比较原发性 IMHA 犬接受阿司匹林或氯吡格雷治疗后通过 TEG-PM 测量的血小板血栓素 A-受体抑制 (TXARI) 和血小板二磷酸腺苷 (ADP)-受体抑制 (ADP-RI),以确定 TEG-PM 是否可用于监测治疗。18 只患有 IMHA 的患犬参与了一项前瞻性双盲研究。这些狗被随机分配接受阿司匹林或氯吡格雷治疗,同时接受标准治疗。在开始治疗前、第 1 天和第 4 天测量血栓弹性描记法。在第 1 天和第 4 天进行血栓弹性描记血小板映射。如果第 4 天阿司匹林组的血小板血栓素 A-受体抑制率 (TXARI) < 50%,氯吡格雷组的血小板二磷酸腺苷 (ADP)-受体抑制率 (ADP-RI) < 50%,则将非应答者定义为 < 50%。在任何时间点,两组之间的平均血小板 TXA-RI 和血小板 ADP-RI 均无显著差异 (P > 0.05)。总体上,TXA-受体的平均抑制百分比为 25%(阿司匹林 33%,氯吡格雷 15%),ADP-受体为 82%(阿司匹林 83%,氯吡格雷 80%)。第 4 天,阿司匹林组 9 只狗中的 6 只(66%)和氯吡格雷组 8 只狗中的 2 只(25%)为非应答者(P = 0.086)。根据 TEG-PM 测量的受体抑制情况,有 2 只被定义为有反应的狗发生了血栓栓塞。总体而言,基于 TEG-PM 测量的受体抑制情况,阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的疗效无显著差异(P > 0.05),常规 TEG 不可靠,无法监测 IMHA 犬的治疗反应。在一些狗中,TEG-PM 结果与临床反应之间存在差异。需要进一步研究 TEG-PM 在狗中的应用,包括其监测治疗反应和调整个体狗的治疗的有用性,以及贫血的任何影响。