Villar Sergio, Carrera Pilar, Oceja Luis
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Iván Pavlov 6, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), Logroño, Spain.
Motiv Emot. 2022;46(4):508-520. doi: 10.1007/s11031-022-09935-4. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
According to the awe-quixoteism hypothesis, one experience of awe may lead to the engagement in challenging actions aimed at increasing the welfare of the world. However, what if the action involves damaging one individual? Across four experiments (N = 876), half participants were induced to feel either awe or a different (pleasant, activating, or neutral-control) emotion, and then decided whether achieving a prosocial goal (local vs. global). In the first three experiments this decision was assessed through a dilemma that involved to sacrifice one individual's life, additionally in Experiments 2 and 3 we varied the quality of the action (ordinary vs. challenging). In Experiment 4, participants decided whether performing a real helping action. Overall, in line with the awe-quixoteism hypothesis, the results showed that previously inducing awe enhanced the willingness to sacrifice someone (Experiments 1, 2 and 3) or the acceptance to help (Experiment 4) when the decision involved engaging in challenges aimed at improving the welfare of the world.
根据敬畏堂吉诃德主义假说,一次敬畏体验可能会导致人们参与旨在增进世界福祉的具有挑战性的行动。然而,如果该行动涉及伤害一个人会怎样呢?在四项实验(N = 876)中,一半的参与者被诱导产生敬畏感或另一种(愉悦、激活或中性对照)情绪,然后决定是否要实现一个亲社会目标(本地目标与全球目标)。在前三项实验中,通过一个涉及牺牲一个人生命的困境来评估这个决定,此外,在实验2和3中,我们改变了行动的性质(普通行动与具有挑战性的行动)。在实验4中,参与者决定是否实施一项真正的帮助行动。总体而言,与敬畏堂吉诃德主义假说一致,结果表明,当决定涉及参与旨在改善世界福祉的挑战时,之前诱导产生的敬畏感会增强牺牲某人的意愿(实验1、2和3)或提供帮助的接受度(实验4)。