School of Psychology, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, New South Wales, Australia.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Jan;57(1):189-209. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12228. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
There are a variety of ways that people can respond to inequality. This article considers the distinction between collective giving and collective acting, but also adopts a focus on the people who engage in those behaviours. Benevolent supporters engage in efforts to alleviate suffering through the transfer of money or provision of goods ('giving'), while activist supporters engage in actions that aim to challenging an underlying injustice or exploitation ('acting'). Using samples obtained through anti-poverty non-governmental organizations (N = 2,340), latent profile analysis suggested two qualitatively different forms of support for global poverty reduction: a benevolent supporter profile (defined by moderate levels of charitable support) and an activist supporter profile (defined by engagement in a suite of socio-political actions). The two forms of support are predicted by different appraisals for, emotional reactions to (outrage v sympathy), and social change beliefs about, global injustice. Results highlight the theoretical and practical importance of considering subgroup differences in how social justice is pursued.
人们对不平等有多种反应方式。本文考虑了集体给予和集体行动之间的区别,但也关注从事这些行为的人。仁慈的支持者通过转移资金或提供物品来努力减轻痛苦(“给予”),而激进的支持者则采取行动,旨在挑战潜在的不公正或剥削(“行动”)。使用通过扶贫非政府组织(N=2340)获得的样本,潜在剖面分析表明,对全球减贫有两种不同形式的支持:仁慈支持者形象(以中等程度的慈善支持为特征)和激进支持者形象(以参与一系列社会政治行动为特征)。这两种支持形式由对全球不公正的不同评价、情感反应(愤怒与同情)和社会变革信念来预测。结果突出了考虑社会正义追求方式的亚组差异的理论和实践重要性。