Fryling Mitch, Hayes Linda J
Division of Special Education and Counseling, California State University, Los Angeles, 5151 State University Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA.
University of Nevada, Reno, NV USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Jul 8;15(1):83-89. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00598-0. eCollection 2022 Mar.
The present article considers acceptance and commitment training (ACT) from the perspective of interbehavioral psychology. Specifically, J. R. Kantor's (1957) explicit distinction between constructs and events is reviewed, with particular attention given to the use of ACT in the practice settings of applied behavior analysis. It is recommended that practitioners be especially sensitive to the distinction between constructs and events as they consider employing ACT interventions. The interbehavioral field construct of interbehavioral psychology is briefly described as a context for conceptualizing both practice and research related to ACT in behavior analysis. Related conceptual issues, especially issues pertaining to the subject matter of behavior analysis and the Skinnerian concept of private events, are considered. The potential value of further integrating interbehavioral thinking into ACT practice and research is described.
本文从行为间心理学的角度探讨接纳与承诺疗法（ACT）。具体而言，回顾了J. R. 坎托（1957）对建构与事件的明确区分，特别关注ACT在应用行为分析实践环境中的应用。建议从业者在考虑采用ACT干预措施时，要特别注意建构与事件之间的区别。行为间心理学的行为间领域建构被简要描述为一个概念框架，用于将行为分析中与ACT相关的实践和研究概念化。文中还探讨了相关的概念问题，特别是与行为分析主题以及斯金纳的私人事件概念相关的问题。阐述了将行为间思维进一步整合到ACT实践和研究中的潜在价值。
