Viale J P, Annat G, Percival C, Bertrand O, Motin J
Intensive Care Med. 1986;12(5):374-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00292929.
Measurements of added inspiratory work (AIW) of breathing imposed by three different CPAP systems were performed in 10 patients. One system was a continuous flow system while the two others were demand flow systems separated from respirators (Ohmeda VD 101 and Draeger CPAP 800 devices). AIW was calculated from pressure and flow signals recorded at the mouthpiece level. The AIW calculated with the two demand-flow systems was found to be the same as the AIW calculated with the continuous flow system although the results obtained by the Draeger device were less constant. The results obtained with the Ohmeda device in our patients conflicted with data previously published using a lung model.
对10名患者进行了由三种不同持续气道正压通气(CPAP)系统施加的额外吸气功(AIW)测量。一种系统是连续气流系统,另外两种是与呼吸机分离的按需气流系统(Ohmeda VD 101和Draeger CPAP 800设备)。AIW是根据在接口器水平记录的压力和流量信号计算得出的。尽管Draeger设备获得的结果不太稳定,但发现用这两种按需气流系统计算出的AIW与用连续气流系统计算出的AIW相同。我们患者中使用Ohmeda设备获得的结果与先前使用肺模型发表的数据相矛盾。