The effects of diet and chronic exercise on skeletal muscle ghrelin response.

BACKGROUND

Recent findings indicate that ghrelin, particularly the unacylated form (UnAG), acutely stimulates skeletal muscle fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and can preserve insulin signaling and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in the presence of high concentrations of saturated fatty acids. However, we recently reported that the stimulatory effect of ghrelin on FAO and subsequent ability to protect insulin stimulated glucose uptake was lost following 6-weeks (6w) of chronic high fat feeding. In the current study we examined the effects of both short-term 5 day (5d) and chronic 6w high-fat diet (HFD) on muscle ghrelin response, and whether exercise training could prevent the development of muscle ghrelin resistance with 6w of HFD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Soleus muscle strips were isolated from male rats to determine the direct effects of acylated (AG) and UnAG isoforms on FAO and glucose uptake. A 5d HFD did not alter the response of soleus muscle to AG or UnAG. Conversely, 6w of HFD was associated with a loss of ghrelin's ability to stimulate FAO and protect insulin stimulated glucose uptake. Muscle response to UnAG remained intact following the 6w HFD with chronic exercise training. Unexpectedly, muscle response to both AG and UnAG was also lost after 6w of low-fat diet (LFD) consumption. Protein content of the classic ghrelin receptor, GHS-R1a, was not affected by diet or training. Corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor-2 (CRF-2R) content, a putative receptor for ghrelin in muscle, was significantly decreased in soleus from 6w HFD-fed animals and increased following exercise training. This may explain the protection of UnAG response with training in HFD-fed rats but does not explain why ghrelin response was also lost in LFD-fed animals.

CONCLUSIONS

UnAG protects muscle glucose uptake during acute lipid oversupply, likely due to its ability to stimulate FAO. This effect is lost in 6w HFD-fed animals but protected with exercise training. Unexpectedly, ghrelin response was lost in 6w LFD-fed animals. The loss of ghrelin response in muscle with a LFD cannot be explained by a change in putative ghrelin receptor content. We believe that the sedentary nature of the animals is a major factor in the development of muscle ghrelin resistance and warrants further research.