He Xiaodan, Li Chengtao
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Key Laboratory of Forensic Science, Academy of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Shanghai, China.
Forensic Sci Res. 2021 Aug 25;7(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1912877. eCollection 2022.
Forensic science is crucial for the administration of justice and case investigation. In China, political-legal organizations, including the courts, public security, procuratorate, and judicial administration, developed their own forensic practices before 2004. As a result, the frequent and repeated appraisals undermined judicial authority and credibility. Thus, a law was published in 2005 to improve the uniform forensic management system by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, leading to the establishment of the Forensic Administration of the Ministry of Justice in 2006. During this process, the increased accreditation and interflow highlighted the role of consensus in forensic standards for forensic service providers to avoid uncertainty regarding the methods used and interpretation of results. In 2017, a policy document was promulgated again to strengthen the importance of the uniform standards, which also proposed to establish a new national technical committee for the standardization of forensic science by the General Office of the State Council. In 2018, despite the continuing problems concerning uniformity, the Forensic Administration of the Ministry of Justice was merged into the Public Legal Services Administration. Yet, there is still a long way to go for the national technical committee for the standardization of forensic science. This paper analyses the evolution of forensic standards internationally and nationally, discusses the existing problems, and proposes relative solutions. Moreover, it discusses the future of standards development with the deepening of the reformation of both the national standardization and judicial system.
法医学对于司法行政和案件调查至关重要。在中国,包括法院、公安、检察和司法行政在内的政法机关在2004年之前就各自开展了法医学实践。结果,频繁重复的鉴定损害了司法权威和公信力。因此,2005年全国人民代表大会常务委员会公布了一项法律,以完善统一的司法鉴定管理制度,2006年司法部司法鉴定管理局成立。在此过程中,鉴定机构资质认定和交流的增加凸显了共识在司法鉴定标准中的作用,以避免司法鉴定服务提供者在使用的方法和结果解释方面存在不确定性。2017年,国务院办公厅再次发布一份政策文件,强调统一标准的重要性,并提议成立一个新的全国法医学标准化技术委员会。2018年,尽管在统一性方面仍存在持续问题,但司法部司法鉴定管理局被并入公共法律服务管理局。然而,全国法医学标准化技术委员会的工作仍有很长的路要走。本文分析了国内外法医学标准的演变,讨论了存在的问题,并提出了相关解决方案。此外,还探讨了随着国家标准化和司法体制改革的深入,标准制定的未来发展。