Mangin P, Bonbled F, Väli M, Luna A, Bajanowski T, Hougen H P, Ludes B, Ferrara D, Cusack D, Keller E, Vieira N
University Center of Legal Medicine, Geneva-Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland,
Int J Legal Med. 2015 Mar;129(2):395-403. doi: 10.1007/s00414-014-1041-x. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
Forensic experts play a major role in the legal process as they offer professional expert opinion and evidence within the criminal justice system adjudicating on the innocence or alleged guilt of an accused person. In this respect, medico-legal examination is an essential part of the investigation process, determining in a scientific way the cause(s) and manner of unexpected and/or unnatural death or bringing clinical evidence in case of physical, psychological, or sexual abuse in living people. From a legal perspective, these types of investigation must meet international standards, i.e., it should be independent, effective, and prompt. Ideally, the investigations should be conducted by board-certified experts in forensic medicine, endowed with a solid experience in this field, without any hierarchical relationship with the prosecuting authorities and having access to appropriate facilities in order to provide forensic reports of high quality. In this respect, there is a need for any private or public national or international authority including non-governmental organizations seeking experts qualified in forensic medicine to have at disposal a list of specialists working in accordance with high standards of professional performance within forensic pathology services that have been successfully submitted to an official accreditation/certification process using valid and acceptable criteria. To reach this goal, the National Association of Medical Examiners (NAME) has elaborated an accreditation/certification checklist which should be served as decision-making support to assist inspectors appointed to evaluate applicants. In the same spirit than NAME Accreditation Standards, European Council of Legal Medicine (ECLM) board decided to set up an ad hoc working group with the mission to elaborate an accreditation/certification procedure similar to the NAME's one but taking into account the realities of forensic medicine practices in Europe and restricted to post-mortem investigations. This accreditation process applies to services and not to individual practitioners by emphasizing policies and procedures rather than professional performance. In addition, the standards to be complied with should be considered as the minimum standards needed to get the recognition of performing and reliable forensic pathology service.
法医专家在法律程序中发挥着重要作用,因为他们在刑事司法系统中提供专业的专家意见和证据,以裁定被告人是否有罪。在这方面,法医学检验是调查过程的重要组成部分,它以科学的方式确定意外和/或非自然死亡的原因及方式,或者在活体遭受身体、心理或性虐待的情况下提供临床证据。从法律角度来看,这类调查必须符合国际标准,即应独立、有效且迅速。理想情况下,调查应由法医领域的董事会认证专家进行,他们在该领域拥有丰富经验,与检察机关无任何层级关系,并能使用适当设施,以便提供高质量的法医报告。在这方面,任何寻求法医专业合格专家的国家或国际公共或私人机构,包括非政府组织,都需要有一份在法医病理学服务中按照高标准专业表现工作的专家名单,这些服务已成功通过使用有效且可接受标准的官方认证程序。为实现这一目标,国家法医协会(NAME)制定了一份认证清单,应作为决策支持,协助被任命评估申请人的检查员。本着与NAME认证标准相同的精神,欧洲法律医学理事会(ECLM)董事会决定成立一个特设工作组,其任务是制定一个类似于NAME的认证程序,但要考虑到欧洲法医学实践的实际情况,且仅限于尸检调查。此认证过程适用于服务而非个体从业者,强调政策和程序而非专业表现。此外,应遵守的标准应被视为获得认可的、可靠的法医病理学服务所需的最低标准。