Saigal S, Watts J, Campbell D
J Pediatr. 1986 Nov;109(5):857-64. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80714-4.
To investigate claims that oscillating mattresses reduce apnea of prematurity and improve growth and neurobehavioural development, we performed a randomized clinical trial using a predetermined sample size. Preterm infants weighing from 750 to 1750 gm at birth were randomly assigned, by 250 gm strata, to either a conventional mattress (n = 63) or to an air mattress (n = 59) oscillating at 14 to 16 regular pulses per minute. Infants remained on the oscillating air mattress for at least 7 days or until 34 weeks postmenstrual age. Apneic episodes occurred and required treatment equally in the two groups; this lack of an effect was seen for both sexes and all weight groups. Both weight and energy intake were similar. Neurobehavioral development as shown by sleep state, habituation testing, and behavioral assessment at term, 3, 6, and 12 months was similar in the two groups. There was no difference in the incidence of neurologic abnormalities. We conclude that an oscillating air mattress has no prophylactic value in reducing apnea and does not enhance growth and development.
为了研究关于振荡床垫可减少早产儿呼吸暂停并改善生长及神经行为发育的说法,我们采用预定样本量进行了一项随机临床试验。将出生时体重750至1750克的早产儿按250克分层,随机分为两组,一组使用传统床垫(n = 63),另一组使用每分钟有14至16次规律脉冲振荡的气垫床(n = 59)。婴儿在振荡气垫床上至少躺7天或直到孕龄34周。两组呼吸暂停发作及需要治疗的情况相同;在男女及所有体重组中均未见效果差异。体重和能量摄入相似。两组在足月时、3个月、6个月和12个月时,由睡眠状态、习惯化测试及行为评估所显示的神经行为发育相似。神经异常的发生率无差异。我们得出结论,振荡气垫床在减少呼吸暂停方面没有预防价值,也不会促进生长发育。