• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型微创骶髂关节融合系统的初步临床结果。

First clinical results of a novel minimally-invasive fusion system for the sacroiliac joint.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Department of Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery, Wadi al Neel Military, Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2022;30(5):1139-1145. doi: 10.3233/THC-213348.

DOI:10.3233/THC-213348
PMID:35342065
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) painful dysfunction is a common source of low back pain (LBP). Several surgical treatment options for SIJ fusion were described. A promising treatment option with demonstrated clinical improvement is the minimally-invasive SIJ fusion.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this case study was to document the effectiveness and safety of the new SIJ system (Torpedo®) over a period of 6 months after the minimally invasive implantation.

METHODS

Patients with failed conservative treatment of painful SIJ dysfunction were enrolled successively in two centers. The Diagnosis was made by positive response to SIJ-injection with local anesthetic and at least by two positive SIJ provocation tests. The Torpedo® Implant system was used for the implantation. This workpiece made of titanium alloy is characterized by a helical profile geometry (CST: chronical spinal turn) with a hydrophilic surface. The evaluated endpoints LBP and grade of disability were assessed using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) preoperatively and at one, three and six months postoperatively.

RESULTS

15 patients (10 female, 5 male; mean age 59 ± 13 years) were operated on one after the other. The pain intensity decreased in all 15 patients. After 6 months, a decrease in the median values of 70% (quartiles 1-3: 65-79%) was calculated. The median values of the Oswestry Disability Index after 6 months were 62% (quartiles 1-3: 53-67) lower than before the operation. Before surgery, 13 patients (87%) were taking opioids for pain management. Six months after the operation, opioids were only needed by 3 patients (20%). Implant malpositioning was not detected on plain radiograph. No surgical site infections or perioperative complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical improvement in early follow up and the absence of surgery related complications demonstrate a high grade of device-related safety and effectiveness of the treatment with a novel minimally-invasive SIJ fusion system.

摘要

背景

骶髂关节(SIJ)疼痛功能障碍是腰痛(LBP)的常见病因。已经描述了几种用于 SIJ 融合的手术治疗选择。一种有前途的治疗选择是微创 SIJ 融合,已证明其具有临床改善效果。

目的

本病例研究的目的是记录新型 SIJ 系统(Torpedo®)在微创植入后 6 个月内的有效性和安全性。

方法

在两个中心连续招募对疼痛性 SIJ 功能障碍的保守治疗失败的患者。通过对局部麻醉的 SIJ 注射有阳性反应,以及至少有两个阳性 SIJ 激发试验来做出诊断。使用 Torpedo®植入系统进行植入。该工具由钛合金制成,其特点是具有螺旋状轮廓几何形状(CST:慢性脊柱旋转)和亲水表面。使用 0-10 数字评分量表(NRS)术前和术后 1、3 和 6 个月评估腰痛和残疾程度这两个评估终点,并使用 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)进行评估。

结果

15 名患者(10 名女性,5 名男性;平均年龄 59±13 岁)逐个进行了手术。所有 15 名患者的疼痛强度均减轻。6 个月后,计算得出疼痛强度中位数降低了 70%(四分位间距 1-3:65-79%)。6 个月后,Oswestry 残疾指数的中位数为 62%(四分位间距 1-3:53-67),低于术前。手术前,13 名患者(87%)服用阿片类药物来缓解疼痛。术后 6 个月,仅 3 名患者(20%)需要服用阿片类药物。在普通 X 光片上未发现植入物错位。没有发生手术部位感染或围手术期并发症。

结论

早期随访时的临床改善以及没有与手术相关的并发症表明,新型微创 SIJ 融合系统具有高度的设备相关安全性和有效性。

相似文献

1
First clinical results of a novel minimally-invasive fusion system for the sacroiliac joint.新型微创骶髂关节融合系统的初步临床结果。
Technol Health Care. 2022;30(5):1139-1145. doi: 10.3233/THC-213348.
2
1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.保守治疗与微创外科治疗骶髂关节疼痛的随机对照试验 1 年结果。
Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):537-550.
3
Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.三叶状钛植入物用于骶髂关节融合。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr;28(4):727-734. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5860-1. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
4
Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.使用三角形钛植入物的微创骶髂关节融合术与非手术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的随机对照试验:12个月的结果。
Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000988.
5
[Minimally invasive arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ)].[骶髂关节微创融合术]
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Apr;34(2):98-108. doi: 10.1007/s00064-021-00738-3. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
6
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series.微创骶髂关节融合术、射频神经消融术与保守治疗对骶髂关节痛的 6 年对比性病例系列研究。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Jan 1;82(1):48-55. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx185.
7
Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.一项关于使用三角形钛植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术与保守治疗的随机对照试验的六个月结果。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):708-719. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4599-9. Epub 2016 May 14.
8
Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.BMI 对骶髂关节融合结果的影响:研究证据以改善保险指南。
Spine J. 2024 May;24(5):783-790. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.11.015. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
9
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节稳定术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(2 Suppl):Editorial. doi: 10.3171/2013.V2.FOCUS13273.
10
One-year results of minimally invasive fusion surgery of the sacroiliac joint as an alternative treatment after failed endoscopic thermal coagulation.骶髂关节微创融合手术作为内镜热凝治疗失败后的替代治疗的一年结果。
Technol Health Care. 2022;30(5):1125-1138. doi: 10.3233/THC-213183.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创外侧、后侧及后外侧骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2025 Feb;53(2):3000605251315300. doi: 10.1177/03000605251315300.
2
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.