Husain Muhammad Jami, Spencer Garrison, Nugent Rachel, Kostova Deliana, Richter Patricia
Division of Global Health Protection, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, US.
Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Seattle, Washington, US.
Glob Heart. 2022 Mar 4;17(1):18. doi: 10.5334/gh.1097. eCollection 2022.
Hyperlipidemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease - the leading cause of death globally. Increased understanding of the cost-effectiveness of hyperlipidemia treatment in low- and middle-income countries can guide approaches to hyperlipidemia management in resource-limited environments. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of hyperlipidemia medication treatment in low- and middle-income countries using studies published between January 2010 and April 2020. We abstracted study details, including study design, treatment setting, intervention type, health metrics, costs standardized to constant 2019 US dollars, and cost-effectiveness measures including average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Comparisons across studies suggested that treatment via polypill is generally more cost-effective than statin-only therapy, and that primary prevention is more cost-effective than secondary prevention. Treating hyperlipidemia at a threshold of 5.7 mmol/l comes at a higher cost per disability-adjusted life-years averted than at a threshold of 6.2 mmol/l. Most pharmacological treatment strategies for hyperlipidemia were found to be cost-effective in most of the examined low- and middle-income countries.
高脂血症是心血管疾病的一个危险因素,而心血管疾病是全球主要的死亡原因。对低收入和中等收入国家高脂血症治疗的成本效益有更深入的了解,可以指导在资源有限的环境中进行高脂血症管理的方法。我们使用2010年1月至2020年4月发表的研究,对低收入和中等收入国家高脂血症药物治疗成本效益的证据进行了系统评价。我们提取了研究细节,包括研究设计、治疗环境、干预类型、健康指标、以2019年不变美元标准化的成本,以及成本效益指标,包括平均和增量成本效益比。研究间的比较表明,通过复方制剂治疗通常比仅使用他汀类药物治疗更具成本效益,而且一级预防比二级预防更具成本效益。与在6.2 mmol/l的阈值进行治疗相比,在5.7 mmol/l的阈值治疗高脂血症每避免一个伤残调整生命年的成本更高。在大多数接受调查的低收入和中等收入国家,大多数高脂血症的药物治疗策略被发现具有成本效益。